campbest
New member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Messages
- 6,500
- Reaction score
- 0
out of curiosity, what is that username?
Would be curious to know as well.
out of curiosity, what is that username?
The 68/69 season was John MacLeod's second season just before he signed Alvan Adams who helped revive the OU basketball program. In fact, the teams Adams was on is why they built the LNC because the fieldhouse couldn't hold enough fans.
I know the 60's was the worst decade for OU basketball. Losing seasons every year except 61 and a .500 record in 67/68. Bad, bad basketball teams.
Maybe against CU, NU or TT.
KSU, @KU, @UT, BU, @OSU are all tough.
@UT, BU, @OSU are all tough.
The only reason we were close last night is because Cade Davis was unconscious, and it's not like he's Michael Neal, Kelley Newton, or Hollis Price. He's had more nights of missing shots than making them, but luckily last night he hit some early in the game. Once he started missing, Texas went from a 12 point deficit to win by 11, so they outscored us by 23 in the final 10 minutes. They blew us out in the 2nd half, basically.
This is sort of like the chicken and egg comment.
If we were truly improving, wouldn't we be winning the occassional game, or not be getting blown out so often?
Uh.....no. All are borderline top 25 teams, two are bubble NCAA teams, and all have but Baylor probably have some rather bad losses.
I can't believe you just called the number what, 6 and 7 Big 12 teams "tough"? We're better than that, come on.
I think you are delusional. If we replayed our entire schedule right now, we would probably be winless. We are a bad, bad basketball team. If you want some sort of positive to hang onto, the only one at this point is we only have 2 games left then it's over for a while. That's it.
oh and also, michael neal is vastly overrated as a shooter/player. I would take cade anyday.
You think if we had played at CU or at NU or Tech either place we would have won last night? What team are you watching?
Either of those 3 are better coached than we are and would score on us every time down the court.
The only reason we were close last night is because Cade Davis was unconscious, and it's not like he's Michael Neal, Kelley Newton, or Hollis Price. He's had more nights of missing shots than making them, but luckily last night he hit some early in the game. Once he started missing, Texas went from a 12 point deficit to win by 11, so they outscored us by 23 in the final 10 minutes. They blew us out in the 2nd half, basically.
so you don't think we win a game in our entire schedule if we replay it now and you call me the delusional one?
oh and also, michael neal is vastly overrated as a shooter/player. I would take cade anyday.
Are you frickin' serious?
yeah. Neal was even more streaky, imo, than cade. I don't know if he was injured or what his senior year but he was bad. Cade shows more ablility to get to the rim as well. I think Cade does more than Neal and is just as good of a shooter
Neal had an injured hand his senior year.
Cade isnt even on the same planet in terms of 3pt shooting in comparison to Neal.
yeah. Neal was even more streaky, imo, than cade. I don't know if he was injured or what his senior year but he was bad. Cade shows more ablility to get to the rim as well. I think Cade does more than Neal and is just as good of a shooter
yeah. Neal was even more streaky, imo, than cade. I don't know if he was injured or what his senior year but he was bad. Cade shows more ablility to get to the rim as well. I think Cade does more than Neal and is just as good of a shooter
That's gotta be a joke...obviously don't remember Neal's junior year.
Should I preface all of my comments on under performing players asking if they were hurt first?Then why not ask?
i do remember it. when talking about his streakiness, i was mostly talking about his senior season. Obviously now I know he was hurt. I didn't know if it was that or if his first season was a fluke.
His JUCO percentages were really good too...his shooting is not a fluke.