I could be wrong, but I actually think three point shooting could be a strength for us next season.
Reaves with his 45% average is our best shooter statistically. Bieniemy led the team last year with a 40% average. Assuming he will be more of a spot up shooter with Harmon playing the point, I think there is a good chance he will be a player our opponents cannot leave open on the perimeter. JB should also benefit from having Harmon handle the ball and put pressure on defenders.
While I agree that great three point shooters average 40% or above, I think anything over 35% is better than average. I have no idea why nearly everyone continues to overlook Jalen Hill? He had a 40% career average from three in high school. He shot 42% from three (41 of 98) as a senior last year, one of the many reasons he was named the Nevada POY.
Manek averaged 36% from three last year. If he improves his shot selection, I think he is capable of continuing that average or better. Moving the line back may actually help a player like Brady take more uncontested shots.
Williams with a 38% average is not what I would call a bad three point shooter. Assuming he makes it in, I think his ability to shoot from the perimeter as well as score off of the dribble drive will make him a legitimate threat on offense.
Harmon can score from the perimeter too. His 38% average may not be earth shattering, but leaving him open could be a mistake. I watched one of his games online last season when Trae Young was in the audience. Da’Vion put on a show by scoring 34 points and knocking down 4 shots from three point range.
None of us really know how moving the line back will effect three point shooting? I think it’s safe to assume extending the line could be a problem for some, not so much for others. But I think we will have so many average to good shooters next season, scoring from the perimeter may be a strength.