Why the Minnesota Timberwolves should draft Buddy Hield

I think he would be a good pick for Minnesota, but I hate the logic used in this article.

I don't understand the fixation on Buddy being "polished" and "the closest thing to a finished product." KAT is 20 years old, while Wiggins and LaVine are 21, yet the author seems to be in this huge rush to accelerate Minnesota's timetable, as if those three guys are in their late 20s and on the brink of unrestricted free agency.

If you're the Wolves, you should draft Buddy only if you believe he's the best long-term prospect--three, four, five years down the road--not because he gives you the best chance of making the playoffs in 2017. His potential immediate impact is a plus, but it shouldn't be a deciding factor.
 
I think the reason you draft a polished player if you are Minnesota isn't to rush the time table, it's more that they already have their franchise players. They need to find skilled players to fit with them rather than swings for the fences. If they blow top 10 picks on busts they are going to retard their progression. I think the worse you are, the more you should care about a players ceiling. The better you are the more you should care about their floor.
 
I think the reason you draft a polished player if you are Minnesota isn't to rush the time table, it's more that they already have their franchise players. They need to find skilled players to fit with them rather than swings for the fences. If they blow top 10 picks on busts they are going to retard their progression. I think the worse you are, the more you should care about a players ceiling. The better you are the more you should care about their floor.
That's understandable, but I'm not sure I agree with Minnesota already being set with franchise players. I'm all-in KAT; I have no doubt that he's going to have a HOF career.

It's probably fair to pencil Wiggins as a future franchise player as well. I'm not convinced that anyone else on the roster will get there...and you could argue that they don't need anyone else to get there. KAT is so special that I wouldn't argue against that. My point is that I think they only have two set pieces, and both of them are so versatile--KAT has the length, athleticism, and shooting ability to excel at either the 4 or the 5, regardless of whether opponents go big or small; Wiggins will capably defend the 1-4 spots in his prime, and his outside shooting will come around--that you can fit pretty much any type of skilled players around them.

On the other hand, Rubio, for all of that he does well, still has such glaring weaknesses that he's the type of guy that you have to surround him with players with very specific skills (namely, plus outside shooting). He's only 25, and he's talented, but I'm not convinced that he's set in stone as a long-term piece. The fact that KAT and Wiggins are so young means that Rubio will be exiting his prime just as KAT and Wiggins enter theirs.

LaVine has a ton of potential, and he fits the same timetable as KAT and Wiggins, but is he going to be a top three guy on a contender, or is he going to be a bench scorer who isn't well-rounded enough to play an even bigger role? Seven years ago, Jeff Green was part of OKC's Big 3. A year later, he was still part of their Big 3 when they made the playoffs for the first time, but he was eventually surpassed by Harden and Ibaka.

Outside of KAT and Wiggins, I don't think there's enough certainty about the rest of Minnesota's roster not to swing for the fences if they see a gamble worth taking. If you draft Buddy, do it because of his ceiling, not so much because of his floor.
 
I like Buddy to Minny over Jamal Murray, certainly. Buddy and Thibodaux would be a hand-in-glove fit between indefatigable worker and taskmaster coach who plays his workhorses constantly.

The biggest weakness in the Wolves' lineups has been a dearth of reliable shooters - even Kevin Martin was way below his career efficiency this season before the buyout - and so for skill set and culture fit, Buddy is a slam dunk. Unless you want to draft someone like Kris Dunn to put the writing on the wall for Rubio, I don't know who else you take at five. Dragan Bender? Domantis Sabonis?
 
Murray won't be there at 5, so I don't think that's a comparison the Wolves need to worry about. Bender and Dunn could be there. I won't pretend to know anything about Bender, but I think Buddy is a better fit for the Wolves than Dunn.

Everything I've read is that scouts view the top 6 prospects in the draft (Simmons, Ingram, Bender, Dunn, Hield, Murray) to be a cut above the rest, with the wildcard being Marques Chriss, a very young, very raw prospect that played one year at U of Washington.


I want Buddy in Minnesota. Aside from Boston, that is far and away the best situation at the top of the draft. I think it's key that Buddy isn't called upon to be his team's best player. Being the 3rd option in Minnesotat would be perfect, allowing him to get way more open looks and not calling on him to have to create his own shot all the time.
 
Murray won't be there at 5, so I don't think that's a comparison the Wolves need to worry about. Bender and Dunn could be there. I won't pretend to know anything about Bender, but I think Buddy is a better fit for the Wolves than Dunn.
It's not out of the question that Murray is in play at 5. Several mocks, including DraftExpress, have Brown going to Phoenix at #4. Some have Murray at #3; others have Bender at #3.

I think Buddy in Minnesota would be mutually beneficial. Thibs will get the most out of Buddy's defensive potential.
 
Denver or bust for Buddy Hield.

Mudiay/Hield/Gallo/Faried/Jokic is a fairly salty lineup, and Mike Malone is a good coach. But is the ceiling in Denver, like, a 4-seed in the West?
 
Looks like quite a few NOLA Pelicans' fans are hopeful that Buddy is still available when their #6 pick comes up.
 
I think Hield is gone by #5.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Denver won't make the playoffs for 2-3 years.. Very young and don't have any depth.. Minn or Pelicans are the best bet!!!
 
Mudiay/Hield/Gallo/Faried/Jokic is a fairly salty lineup, and Mike Malone is a good coach. But is the ceiling in Denver, like, a 4-seed in the West?

I am going to disagree with Smash and say the Nuggets start Jokic and Nurkic together...

PG: Mudiay
SG: Hield
SF: Gallo
PF: Jokic
C: Nurkic
 
As a longtime Sixers fan, I'd love to have him. Lord knows we need shooters.

As a compassionate human being, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. :facepalm
 
As a longtime Sixers fan, I'd love to have him. Lord knows we need shooters.

As a compassionate human being, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. :facepalm

You already got rid of Hinkie, no need to shoot him. :ez-laugh:
 
Denver won't make the playoffs for 2-3 years.. Very young and don't have any depth.. Minn or Pelicans are the best bet!!!
Denver has plenty of depth; their 8th-9th guys are solid, compared to the rest of the league. This season Randy Foye averaged more minutes per game in Denver than in OKC.

The problem is that their best offensive option is Gallinari, who aside from not stacking up well to other #1 options, misses 20-30 games every year.
 
Denver needs to swing for the fences. They are exactly the type of team that should not be drafting a high floor, lower ceiling guy like Buddy. They need some stars to lead their roster of nice complementary pieces.
 
I do not care where Buddy goes as long as I get to see him on TV a lot. He should be a real asset to the league and whatever city picks him.
 
Back
Top