I don't think you understood what was being discussed before the game if that is your takeaway. You were stating essentially that there was no way Houston had a chance and that Duke was way too good and would overwhelm them. The argument from others was that you were not giving Houston enough credit and they would compete because of the talent, coaching, and effort expected from them. No one said they didn't agree that Duke was the more talented team, but the point others and myself were making then was that Houston is more than capable of beating Duke on any given night. They are a damn good team. You weren't wrong because Duke lost, you were wrong because of the level to which you were discounting Houston.