Cleavon Little
New member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2009
- Messages
- 373
- Reaction score
- 0
Would any coach in America finish 13-17 with this team?
Leaning toward yes...
Would any coach in America finish 13-17 with this team?
Leaning toward yes...
If that's true, we'd all better buckle in and get comfy. This isn't going to be turned around in 1 or 2 years. It's more likely 3 or 4, at best.
If that's true, we'd all better buckle in and get comfy. This isn't going to be turned around in 1 or 2 years. It's more likely 3 or 4, at best.
Did you criticize Capel when we scored 46 vs Nebraska and lost by 19 to the perennial conference cellar-dweller in his first season?
The difference is Capel took over a good program, Kruger was handed a big old **** sandwich and he is having to eat it.
You bet your ass I did. But Kruger has been handed essentially the same team and is doing essentially the same thing that Capel did. So I go back to my earlier question: is our talent level really so bad that the coach is irrelevant? Would any coach in America finish 13-17 with this team?
You're obviously not following. I'm saying last year's team is roughly equivalent to this year's team as far as the talent level is concerned.
A D so far for Kruger.
Capel is awesome.
Thank you. I believe in Joe C.If that's true, we'd all better buckle in and get comfy. This isn't going to be turned around in 1 or 2 years. It's more likely 3 or 4, at best.
I wouldn't say that "Cade was that good", but guards are WAY more important then forwards in college basketball. And our guards stink. If we had Cade instead of Cam, we'd probably have 3-4 more wins. If we have Cade instead of Cam, AND Newell hadn't left, probably 4-5 more wins.
I asked this over a month ago, and it never got answered.....how many "good" teams are there in the major conferences that don't have a single TRUE shooting guard or wing to bring off the bench? Our back up guards for nearly the entire season have been Blair (a pg) and Neal (really doesn't have a position, but dang sure isn't a guard). We literally have NO true 2/3 on the bench, and our starting 3 has stunk for much of the season. How can you expect more wins?
You bet your ass I did. But Kruger has been handed essentially the same team and is doing essentially the same thing that Capel did. So I go back to my earlier question: is our talent level really so bad that the coach is irrelevant? Would any coach in America finish 13-17 with this team?
The talent level is not that low. We are playing teams equal in the first half and getting run in the second half. That's coaching.
As the season is going along things are getting worse which probably means the players have lost faith in him too.
There is no excuse for Cam regressing the way he has and we should be getting a lot more from Osby too.
A D so far for Kruger.
Are you hallucinating or suffering from memory loss and blackouts? On a scale of 1 - 10 for D1 teams, Capel inherited about 5 or 6. Kruger inherited a 3 or 4.