Bedlam

You are articulate and intelligent, but a better argument doesn't change things. It isn't what one player can do, it is what replacements do, given the chance. I just think its funny that some fans think that one player makes a team (or in this case, unmakes a team).
And yes, we COULD win games the rest of the year without Maddie. Never know what players with more opportunities can accomplish.

I think that Maddie is what Sherri has been hoping for. When recruited, she was called another Stacy Dales. Post-injury, that never developed. But, she has begun to come into it this year, with probably the last aspect being a desire to take the scoring lead. But, Maddie brings something to the game that we have no other player that can bring. If she isn't shooting, she can alter a game with defense, and she has. She beat TCU in Fort Worth once just by blocking shots and getting steals. Today, we had nobody getting on the boards, and she responded with nine boards.

We have no other player who can get as many tips to keep a ball in play, or who can initiate a process leading to a steal. She can change a game in many ways.

The key is that Maddie isn't looking first at herself. She looks to see how she can set someone else up if she is guarded. She also tends to get into an open area, which other players simply don't find enough. She is the closest thing we have to an all-around player who can provide us with another defender, another scorer, another rebounded, another shot blocker, another point guard, another end of game ball handler.

Peyton is pretty good. But, Peyton focuses on her own shot and scoring and isn't the best at dribbling, or setting others up.
 
You sure do carry a big torch for Maddie. This team can be good without her, but it will be an adjustment period. I definitely don't think we would be in the bottom half of the conference. If Maddie was consistently good every night, I'd be more concerned. However, her inconsistency is what makes me think we will be okay regardless of what happens with her health.
I think without Maddie we are in a fight with TCU and Kansas, certainly not a team that swept Iowa State, OSU, and Kansas.
 
I says a lot about this board when people catch more flack for liking an OU player than they do if they constantly criticize OU players.
 
Oh by the way, does Jenni Carlson now feel the need to praise Sherri for sweeping Bedlam again? Of course, that's a rhetorical question....
 
A win at Stillwater has us up to #17 in the rpi. Now, if only Maddie is OK.
 
That was a key win for us and would put us in pretty good position, but the loss of Maddie turns everything on its head.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I says a lot about this board when people catch more flack for liking an OU player than they do if they constantly criticize OU players.
No criticism for liking Maddie. I disagreed with the criticism of the team, that losing one player, maybe our best player, means we aren't a top 100 team, only 9th place in our conference. You deserve flack for the lack of respect for the rest of the team. Our other players are better than 9th place.
There is lots to criticize me about, but please do so for what I actually do.
 
Last edited:
No criticism for liking Maddie. I disagreed with the criticism of the team, that losing one player, maybe our best player, means we aren't a top 100 team, only 9th place in our conference. You deserve flack for the lack of respect for the rest of the team. Our other players are better than 9th place.
There is lots to criticize me about, but please do so for what I actually do.

Could not have said it any better.
 
http://www.rpiratings.com/womrate.php

Above is the sagarin ratings. Not being in the top 100 is kinda humorous, losing one player. I appreciate the entertainment provided by some.

I just watched the Tennessee - Georgia game, which was won by Georgia.

Folks, based on what I saw, Tennessee is definitely overrated. Georgia is not very good, with only 1 win out of 9 games against the top 50.

Tennessee has a losing record on the road for the season, and only a 15-8 record for the season. And lost again today.

Why are they rated so highly? They are actually rated almost as high as Texas in the NCAA rpi ratings. That is crazy. So why is that going on?
 
I just watched the Tennessee - Georgia game, which was won by Georgia.

Folks, based on what I saw, Tennessee is definitely overrated. Georgia is not very good, with only 1 win out of 9 games against the top 50.

Tennessee has a losing record on the road for the season, and only a 15-8 record for the season. And lost again today.

Why are they rated so highly? They are actually rated almost as high as Texas in the NCAA rpi ratings. That is crazy. So why is that going on?

They do have a win against ND.
 
I just watched the Tennessee - Georgia game, which was won by Georgia.

Folks, based on what I saw, Tennessee is definitely overrated. Georgia is not very good, with only 1 win out of 9 games against the top 50.

Tennessee has a losing record on the road for the season, and only a 15-8 record for the season. And lost again today.

Why are they rated so highly? They are actually rated almost as high as Texas in the NCAA rpi ratings. That is crazy. So why is that going on?

They were playing pretty good ball recently. They beat Notre Dame in South Bend a week or two ago. They probably have Top 3 talent (definitely Top 5) but can't put it together. I just wonder how long Holly gets.
 
I don't think Tennessee plays well together, and their games often end up being how good is DeShields doing. But, they do have one thing going for them. The freshman class that they are bringing in has real talent, UConn type talent, Tennessee of olden days talent.
 
I says a lot about this board when people catch more flack for liking an OU player than they do if they constantly criticize OU players.


Agreed.

I will criticize one thing about the game, and that was the telecast. I thought both announcers needed to return the orange-and-black pom poms when the game was over. :mad:
 
I thought the same thing.....It was a Jensen love fest for sure. Usually those two announcers are very equal to both teams....but not on Saturday. They were always SO excited when OSU made a basket.....Don't know what that was all about, but it surprised me.
 
I thought the same thing.....It was a Jensen love fest for sure. Usually those two announcers are very equal to both teams....but not on Saturday. They were always SO excited when OSU made a basket.....Don't know what that was all about, but it surprised me.

Yeah, it was a Fox Sports telecast as well, not just an osu.

I think OU has the best tier 3 announcers in Big 12, period. They are ALWAYS are very gracious to opposing team, sometimes too gracious, it seems. We also have best production as well.

LHN actually has decent announcers (not horribly biased) but the other lowlifes in Big 12 are terrible, Hypocrite U, Tech and osu, that I've noticed the most.
 
Last edited:
I thought the same thing.....It was a Jensen love fest for sure. Usually those two announcers are very equal to both teams....but not on Saturday. They were always SO excited when OSU made a basket.....Don't know what that was all about, but it surprised me.


I wasn't too terribly surprised that the DOK awarded the Cowgirls a coveted moral victory for making it close. :ez-roll::ez-roll:

I'm pretty sure the OU "moral defeat" now means that we're 33-6 against them in the last 39 games.
 
Back
Top