AdaSooner
Admin Emeritus
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2008
- Messages
- 16,086
- Reaction score
- 49
I only see him going to the lakers if they trade down.
:woot:woot:dance005:
As I say this it's reported that the Lakers are shopping Russell for a top 5 pick.
Russell is a 20-year-old who was drafted #2 overall just a year ago, then made one off-court mistake. Swaggy P is a terrible 31-year-old player who habitually makes mistakes on and off the court. There is a much simpler solution to that situation than selling low on Russell.Has to be a good move for the Lakers. That locker room will be a bad place as long as Russell and Swaggy P are there together.
Russell is a 20-year-old who was drafted #2 overall just a year ago, then made one off-court mistake. Swaggy P is a terrible 31-year-old player who habitually makes mistakes on and off the court. There is a much simpler solution to that situation than selling low on Russell.
If the Lakers are dangling Russell for a Top 5 pick simply because they think they can get a better player than Russell with the pick, that's reasonable. That Nick Young video shouldn't play any role whatsoever (I know it probably does, but it shouldn't). I understand the locker room tension created by that situation, but Russell is the most talented player on that roster, and nearly every other player in that locker room is dead weight. I'd take Russell alone over the rest of that roster.
If they can trade Russell for Dunn I would do it.
Any place that employs Nick Young is a bad place.Has to be a good move for the Lakers. That locker room will be a bad place as long as Russell and Swaggy P are there together.
As good as Dunn is, I think you want the guy who's a superior shooter/scorer when he has so few options to feed. Russell and Brandon Ingram could become a poor man's Westbrook and Durant with some good secondary pieces and a few years. Dunn's defense is more impressive, but I think getting an athletic rim protector is the priority with Hibbert being unplayable and Randle not fitting that role.