Sooner Quick
New member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 1,734
- Reaction score
- 0
Saying he is not for the one and done deal and that something needs to be done about it. Just thought I'd pass it along.
I don't like the one and done rule, and don't want a two and done rule. If a kid feels he is ready to enter the NBA as a teenager, let him do so.
Restricting when a player can go pro seems to work pretty well for the NFL. I'd like to see the NBA enforce the same rule -- they can't join the NBA until three years after they graduate high school.
It's a rare kid who's mature enough to decide whether he's ready for the NBA. What happens to those young athletes who listen to boneheaded, self-serving advisors but don't make it into the NBA? They're left out altogether.
Restricting when a player can go pro seems to work pretty well for the NFL. I'd like to see the NBA enforce the same rule -- they can't join the NBA until three years after they graduate high school.
It's a rare kid who's mature enough to decide whether he's ready for the NBA. What happens to those young athletes who listen to boneheaded, self-serving advisors but don't make it into the NBA? They're left out altogether.
The rule should be similar to baseball. They can go to the NBA right after high school or go to college. If they choose to go to college, they have to say for a set time - 2 or 3 years.
Restricting when a player can go pro seems to work pretty well for the NFL. I'd like to see the NBA enforce the same rule -- they can't join the NBA until three years after they graduate high school.
It's a rare kid who's mature enough to decide whether he's ready for the NBA. What happens to those young athletes who listen to boneheaded, self-serving advisors but don't make it into the NBA? They're left out altogether.
I believe that if a young man put in for the NBA draft and was left out, he should have every right to enroll back into school and go right back to learning, the game and everything that college is there to teach us. Why change to rules up for a handful of guys that have the talent and are really going to get paid well. Let them go get that money while they are young and healthy, if they are over 18 then it should be their right to work for who ever will hire them.
I agree with you and BigTime about having a two-year rule with the option to enter the NBA straight out of high school. The NBA's logic in the one-year rule was that players would be more NBA-ready when they entered the league and that they would be more instantly marketable, and in some cases it has worked (i.e. Kevin Durant, Derrick Rose, etc.) However, this year's draft is going to have several lottery picks who are still raw players lacking instant marketability. What did Jrue Holiday and Demar DeRozan accomplish by going to college for a year? How much does the average NBA fan know about these players? No offense to those guys in particular (I like Holiday as a prospect), but what NBA fan base is going to get excited over drafting these players? Furthermore, how much did their schools get out of it? A two-year rule with the option of making the jump from high school really would benefit both the NBA and the NCAA.My personal feelings on this topic is that anyone should be able to come out after high school and enter the NBA Draft...but if you arent drafted or decide to go to college/overseas first you are required to spend 3 (possibly 2)seasons at that level before you are allowed to enter the NBA Draft...
I think this would eliminate some of the weaker drafts we are seeing now and players will have the ability to develop more if they arent ready straight out of high school to be dominant...Would be good for both the NBA and College...