So if that is your opinion, I’d like to hear you explain a couple things. One, on all but one possession in the final three minutes, we had Mo on the court rather than Kirill. On many of those possessions, we were trailing by 3. Kirill was coming off a game where he his four 3s, and he hit another one yesterday. He is clearly a better offensive threat than Mo. What is the rationale?
Two, in that same sequence down the stretch, we got one, at most two, quality shots. Our ball movement was awful, we turned it over twice (once by Mo at the top of the key), and our guards spent way too much time dribbling. Bama, meanwhile, consistently got clean looks for good players. How many times in five years have we seen that pattern play out at the end of a close game?
Three, the game completely flipped in the first minute of the second half. Everyone watching the game could feel it, especially anyone who has watched OU the past few years. As Sooner04 poster, how can Moser see the sloppiness in that stretch (botched defensive assignment, turnover, etc) and not call timeout while we are still up six, rather than waiting and hoping against hope that our guys would figure it out on their own? This happened one week after he let A&M take over the game without using a single timeout.
And as for the argument that we would have won if Pack shot better, Bama had a poor shooting game and was awful at the line. Their star missed about 50 free throws by himself.
In a conference where most games are close (we get blown out more than most teams, though), coaching makes a huge difference in the last few minutes of games. Yesterday was just the latest example of Moser getting worked over during that stretch.