GAME 33- SEC TOURNAMENT - OKLAHOMA (18-14) vs TAMU (21-10) 8:30pm CST on SEC NETWORK

I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and restate this more clearly.

Regardless of a personal view of the play-in round, do you think UNC should have been included over other large bids by their resume alone based on the committee’s stated criteria? That seems like a clear data point where elite programs get the benefit of the doubt over generic P5 programs (like WVU).

If you want to turn this into a referendum on the play-in round, no need to continue further.
I think using one anecdotal example is always a poor way to make an argument. As an example: the very same Tar Heels were first four out three years ago. Did the committee not care about TV ratings that year?
 
if they let them get away with that hand check it is going to be a long night
 
Back
Top