I'm sure this is buried in a couple threads, but what is the word on Harkless? Are we trying to get him eligible? Seems like we are pretty deep, so I don't know if he'd get any playing time.
I don't have any inside info, but I feel like he is a better basketball player than Williams and would challenge Williams and Gibson for their guard minutes. Phipps is the best shooter of the bunch, so I don't think he'll lose minutes to Harkless. The other two might.
Having said that, if I'm Harkless, I'm redshirting ... Reaves, Harmon, Manek are going to take up so many minutes this year, and Kuath, Hill, and Vic are going to play big minutes too because of their size and versatility (and rebounding).
Not a lot of minutes left to split between Williams, Gibson, Phipps, and Harkless. Next year he'll have a chance to start or be the 6th man.
Dont be surprised if several seniors come back.
Everyone can come back for an extra year if they want. No need to redshirt. I dont think hes as good as Williams. Bunch of depth for sure.
Here is the thing, Reaves, Manek, arent coming off the floor much, Harmon is almost to that point. SO 6-7 guys fighting for 2 or 3 spots.
Dont be surprised if several seniors come back.
Music to my ears.
I totally forgot about that. If Kuath comes back, he could probably make himself some money with the extra development time and time in the weight room.
We've only got 4 seniors, and several sounds like more than two. I expect Williams and Kuath to hang around because both can improve their post-graduate opportunities that way ... but Reaves or Manek?
In a way I think those two are perfect candidates to benefit from an additional year. Right now, if I had to guess I would say right now Manek is a fringe NBA prospect... MAYBE get a glance in second round if he has a big year. Maybe get a G League opportunity. For sure could get paid overseas. Reaves less so because he doesn’t have the size and I don’t think he’s a point guard— certainly not at the NBA level. He really does have some talent, so you never know if he could battle his way into the radar, but I think we’d all agree that overseas is probably his best shot after college as well.
So for me, assuming that neither of them are in dire straits financially, playing an extra year has a lot of potential benefits— feel it could only enhance whatever chances they have at the NBA and certainly won’t stop them from going overseas one year later than they would have. Plus the huge bonus is getting to play D1 hoops at a high level for another year— I bet if they came back, OU would be well positioned to make a big run next year— and that in itself has appeal— especially if you aren’t putting an NBA career on hold to do it.
You’d have to know them personally of course to understand their situations and desires, but if either were my son, I’d likely to steer them towards staying if it’s something they really enjoyed. You can’t ever replicate that college experience again in your life.
Reaves less so because he doesn’t have the size and I don’t think he’s a point guard— certainly not at the NBA level. He really does have some talent, so you never know if he could battle his way into the radar, but I think we’d all agree that overseas is probably his best shot after college as well.
I agree and I was thinking yesterday that the guy with the most NBA potential on the team is Kur Kuath because you just can't teach that kind of length and athleticism. Plus he's developing a nice little soft jump shot. One more year might be huge for him.
No doubt about it. Kur’s length, athleticism and raw talent makes him the ideal candidate to benefit from another season in OU’s strength and conditioning program. If he made another jump in his ability to score, rebound and defend, NBA scouts couldn’t possibly ignore his size and potential.
Seems like he’s good to go now. Lon said it will take some time to get him up to speed game-wise. Should be real interdicting to see the rotation once we hit the meat of the schedule