Seymore Cox
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 9,133
- Reaction score
- 234
There have been alot talk on this board about Harriso Barnes and Cameron Clark. OU has recruited both of these guys heavily and in Clark's case, the interest has be reciprocated. From seeing both of these guys play through film and AAU feeds, I was struck by a couple of things. I was struck by the fact that both of these guys are legit in their heights. I think Clark is close to 6'7 and Barnes is clearly 6'7. The other thing I noticed was the versatility in their games.
Clark vs. Barnes the player comparison
Watching these two guys, both of them stand out as big wing players that can shoot over competition with ease. Clark may have the better shot and better catch and shoot game, but there are some slight mechanical issues. Barnes is a guy that can do all things well. He's a good shooter, great slasher, has a pro body, and is physical enough to play the 4 on an all conference level. Clark will need a year or two to mature his body where Barnes is almost on the level of Lebron coming out of High School as far as body maturity.
Clark vs. Barnes effect on a program
Barnes and Clark's effect on a program can vary depending on the schools they choose. If Barnes goes to a UNC type school loaded with players, he'll have a modest first year. In comparison, Ed Davis, a top 4 pick in many opinions had very modest stats. If Barnes were to choose an OU, or if Singler were to leave and he chose Duke, he would have great numbers. UK is a wild card with Barnes because their style has enough points to go around. KU may have put themselves in a tougher situation with Barnes because X. Henry may play more than one year. Regardless of the school he chooses, he's a one and done type guy. Clark on the other hand is similar to a James Anderson in the fact that he'll need to work on his physique and some things in his game to get better. Last year people made analysis of Getting Rotnei Clarke over Willie Warren because Clarke was a four year guy and Warren potentially could be a 1 year guy. That analysis wasn't a good one because the talent level was such a wide gap, but with Clark and Barnes, both guys are NBA potential players, but Clark is more apt to stay 3 years where Barnes is one and done. Also, Clark would continue to help OU build a strong base in Texas where as in Rotnei Clarke and Harrison Barnes case, OU probably isn't going to follow up with recruiting Ames and Claremore.
Of course my choice would be for both, but if it came down to it and the interest of the program long range were what was the most important thing, I would go with Cameron Clark.
Clark vs. Barnes the player comparison
Watching these two guys, both of them stand out as big wing players that can shoot over competition with ease. Clark may have the better shot and better catch and shoot game, but there are some slight mechanical issues. Barnes is a guy that can do all things well. He's a good shooter, great slasher, has a pro body, and is physical enough to play the 4 on an all conference level. Clark will need a year or two to mature his body where Barnes is almost on the level of Lebron coming out of High School as far as body maturity.
Clark vs. Barnes effect on a program
Barnes and Clark's effect on a program can vary depending on the schools they choose. If Barnes goes to a UNC type school loaded with players, he'll have a modest first year. In comparison, Ed Davis, a top 4 pick in many opinions had very modest stats. If Barnes were to choose an OU, or if Singler were to leave and he chose Duke, he would have great numbers. UK is a wild card with Barnes because their style has enough points to go around. KU may have put themselves in a tougher situation with Barnes because X. Henry may play more than one year. Regardless of the school he chooses, he's a one and done type guy. Clark on the other hand is similar to a James Anderson in the fact that he'll need to work on his physique and some things in his game to get better. Last year people made analysis of Getting Rotnei Clarke over Willie Warren because Clarke was a four year guy and Warren potentially could be a 1 year guy. That analysis wasn't a good one because the talent level was such a wide gap, but with Clark and Barnes, both guys are NBA potential players, but Clark is more apt to stay 3 years where Barnes is one and done. Also, Clark would continue to help OU build a strong base in Texas where as in Rotnei Clarke and Harrison Barnes case, OU probably isn't going to follow up with recruiting Ames and Claremore.
Of course my choice would be for both, but if it came down to it and the interest of the program long range were what was the most important thing, I would go with Cameron Clark.