I have to say, there is a ridiculous amount of passive-aggressiveness in a thread that should be dedicated to celebrating Hield's tremendous accomplishment. I had to read through that other thread, if I did read the right one, to see what prompted all of this venom and -- I know I'll catch hell for this -- I never read anyone "rooting" for Valentine to win. I thought Hield deserved to be player of the year as most here did, but the notion that it should have been a runaway or no-contest or that Valentine had no argument is patently absurd.
I would expect most OU fans to believe Buddy should win, just as I would expect most MSU fans to believe Valentine should win. And there's an argument for him. I'm not on that side, as I said, but I also wasn't that surprised that he won. I'm glad that Hield won most of the player of the year awards and, unlike some others, don't feel personally insulted that he didn't sweep them.
The point is that it's childish and ridiculous to create some sort of "us vs them" with other members of this group simply because they made an argument for Valentine to be player of the year. If anything, Valentine's great year (and it most certainly was great) helps to demonstrate how tremendous Buddy's was, since Buddy ended up winning most of the awards. Congrats to Buddy for winning the Wooden, the Naismith, and the Oscar Robertson awards and to Valentine for a tremendous season as well. He's a class act and a great basketball player.
Flame away.