Just as Booger and Carlweathers said, the argument has changed. Now that Booger has shown an example or 2 , the argument is now who didn't start on a Nat'l TITLE TEAM???
The original debate occurred because it was said someone of Randle's stature would be GURANTEED a starting spot, and anyone who thinks not doesn't know hoops. That was the premise of the original argument.
The truth of the matter is an old school coach like LK might find 10000000 reasons to not start a frosh immediately. I have given you all several reasons, and Booger followed up with more.
I'll say again, what if the kid is lazy and doesn't work as hard in college? Look further than Sooner football for that scenario. What if other guys are playing lights out by then??? M'Baye and Spangler could easily be the 1st day starters. Heck many here had both Osby & M'Baye as lottery picks before they set foot on the LNC in a REAL game. Remember that???
Booger brought up a great example I remembered and didn't get back to list. Billy Tubbs brought WAYMAN TISDALE off the bench his 1st few games. He had his coming out party against UNLV a few games into the season. Are you kidding me????? WWT came off the bench his first few games because we had experienced guys. No doubt he was the best player in OKla. before he graduated at BTW, but Tubbs elected to go with Big Time Jones at the center, initially.
Just admit you can't guarantee a player as a day one starter. Stop trying to change the argument. Not one of us who dissented said Randle didn't have the tools, potential, and likelihood of starting, we said he isn't guaranteed to start with an old school coach like LK. If Tisdale can come off the bench behind Big Time Jones, then anyone can come off the bench.......