New softball thread

In softball rpi is everything. In previous seasons OU's rpi has been up there, this season it was only 13th and the seeding showed accordingly. Dont understand what the big deal is, if you want a higher go out and beat more of those big games you scheduled.

I agree with you that winning important games would solve seeding issues. I don't agree that RPI is all it's cracked up to be. I thought the same thing when the RPI said the Big 12 was the best basketball conference.
 
It was obvious that the committee did not trust either of the polls. For OU to drop 6/7 spots is evidence of that. The committee does what it whats which is why they didn't stop the game in that horrible downpour against Alabama in the championship. The committee controls everything. There is no way this should have happened but you are at the mercy of the committee and the Big 12 wasn't a strong conference this year. The SEC got 11 teams in the tournament. OU has had this happened before and will use this as motivation. Having to go to Alabama will be like having to go to Arizona a few years ago. Would love nothing better than to eliminate Alabama on their own field. But gotta win the regional first.

The Big 12 had 4 of 7 teams make the tourney. The B1G had 4 of 14 teams make the tourney! Iowa, who we run-ruled 2 of 3 games, made the semi-finals of the B1G tourney. Mich didn't take a hit for playing in that conference.
 
I agree with you that winning important games would solve seeding issues. I don't agree that RPI is all it's cracked up to be. I thought the same thing when the RPI said the Big 12 was the best basketball conference.

I'm with Norm on this one. I've never really understood RPI; I believe the eye-test is a much more accurate way to gauge the strength of a team. I've watched quite a bit of NCAA softball this season, and my eyes tell me the Sooners are easily one of the top five teams in the country – selection committee be damned.
 
Here's a couple more tidbits:

The rainout of our two-game set with OSU dropped our RPI even lower. As of this morning, the official NCAA site has us at No. 14, one spot behind (insert drum roll) Hofstra (37-12) of that powerhouse Colonial League. This would actually be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Still, some of us may not realize that the Sooners still have a legitimate shot at hosting a Super Regional. The top eight seeds left in the field after the first weekend will host the Supers. With OU at No. 11, that means just three of the teams seeded above us must lose their regionals for us to host on the second weekend (that's assuming we win our regional, of course).

The way I see it, No. 10 Missouri, No. 9 Florida State, No. 8 Tennessee and No. 7 UCLA all have tough regional opponents. A few other top seeds could also conceivably lose. The top four seeds, with the possible exception of Michigan, were basically given clear shots to the Supers.

What say you?
 
I don't think they re-seed...so someone other than Bama needs to win their regional for us to host the super regional.
 
I don't think they re-seed...so someone other than Bama needs to win their regional for us to host the super regional.

You may be right, Soonercuda. I thought the top eight seeds left after the first weekend each got to host a Super. But I've been known to be wrong once or twice in my message board career. :ez-laugh:
 
Here's a couple more tidbits:

The rainout of our two-game set with OSU dropped our RPI even lower. As of this morning, the official NCAA site has us at No. 14, one spot behind (insert drum roll) Hofstra (37-12) of that powerhouse Colonial League. This would actually be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Still, some of us may not realize that the Sooners still have a legitimate shot at hosting a Super Regional. The top eight seeds left in the field after the first weekend will host the Supers. With OU at No. 11, that means just three of the teams seeded above us must lose their regionals for us to host on the second weekend (that's assuming we win our regional, of course).

The way I see it, No. 10 Missouri, No. 9 Florida State, No. 8 Tennessee and No. 7 UCLA all have tough regional opponents. A few other top seeds could also conceivably lose. The top four seeds, with the possible exception of Michigan, were basically given clear shots to the Supers.

What say you?

Speaking of Hofstra - the weather harmed us with Hofstra. OU was supposed to play Hofstra two games on the weekend of Feb 28. They were lost to heavy rain causing the Sooners to attempt to play in Conroe, TX where they beat hapless IPFW two games.
 
You may be right, Soonercuda. I thought the top eight seeds left after the first weekend each got to host a Super. But I've been known to be wrong once or twice in my message board career. :ez-laugh:

You are not wrong, if Washington could upset Bama this weekend in Tuscaloosa then they would travel to Norman with OU hosting the Supers.
 
OU finishes regular season at #5 in the ASA and USA Softball Poll. No doubt that OU got screwed but I think they can beat Alabama in Tuscaloosa.
 
Graham Hays article excerpt for all those people that think you need 2 pitchers in the NCAA tournament to win it.

3. How many pitchers does it take to win a championship?
Erin Gabriel
Tennessee Athletics
Auburn and Tennessee pitchers such as Erin Gabriel, pictured above, combined for just 29 complete games in 113 starts this season.
That isn't the set-up for a joke of the light bulb variety. It's a question that in some ways may define how this tournament -- and this college softball season -- is remembered.

As of this past weekend, Division I teams had already scored almost four thousand more runs this season than they did in the entirety of the 2014 season, which itself set a record for the most runs per game scored in NCAA history. Offense is everywhere.

Not coincidentally, as teams look for someone, anyone to get some outs, "pitching staff" has become the phrase of the season. It seems increasingly as if the softball ace who starts almost every game and finishes what she starts is going the way of baseball counterpart Old Hoss Radbourn -- the 19th century Hall of Famer, not the Twitter star from the 21st century.

Just five seasons ago, pitchers in the Pac-12 completed 54 percent of all starts. Entering play this past Saturday, the current crop of Pac-12 pitchers had completed 34 percent of games started this season. They aren't alone. Go back to that same 2011 season and Big 12 pitchers completed 57 percent of their games. This season it's 41 percent. Big Ten pitchers completed 58 percent of their games in 2011 and 44 percent this season.

That isn't indicative of one or two programs spreading the innings around. It is at least the framework of a seismic shift (and the percentage of games completed in those power conferences has, in fact, declined at a more or less steady rate over the past five seasons).

There are no better example of the new look than the teams that just played for the SEC tournament title Saturday night (in Baton Rouge, home of LSU's pitching quartet).

Auburn and Tennessee pitchers combined for just 29 complete games in 113 starts this season. In her final season in Knoxville, Monica Abbott alone threw 45 complete games. Even more telling, Megan Rhodes threw eight complete games as the No. 2 pitcher that season, two more than any of Tennessee's current pitchers have at the moment.

Yet when push comes to shove, which is to say when we get to the postseason, it remains difficult for coaches to play anything other than the hot hand. For as much talk as there was about Florida using all three of its pitchers in the game that clinched the championship a season ago, Hannah Rogers still pitched 66 percent of the team's postseason innings, and 78 percent of its postseason innings beyond the regional round.

Similarly, Oklahoma generated considerable buzz when it started No. 2 pitcher Michelle Gascoigne in the clincher in 2013. Yet Keilani Ricketts pitched 81 percent of the team's postseason innings, including all 12 innings the night before Gascoigne's start -- and Gascoigne was one of 10 finalists for national player of the year that season.

In both cases, we saw something different than Taryne Mowatt throwing more than a thousand pitches in a week during Arizona's title run in 2007 or Dallas Escobedo throwing every postseason inning for Arizona State in 2011. But not that different.

The only time in the super regional era that we saw a team win a championship while consistently using a true pitching staff when it mattered was UCLA in 2010. Who remembers that Aleah Macon led the Bruins in innings pitched that postseason or that Donna Kerr was in the circle when the postseason began and ended? Even in that case, the Bruins likely would have handed the ball to Megan Langenfeld more often had she not been bothered by blisters.

Will a staff win the championship this season? Or will a pitcher?
 
So are we locked in to play alabama or wash? What if 3 teams above us lose their regional but one of them is not alabama? Do we still move up and get to host? Or do we still play bama? I'd feel better about our chances if we were 9th, I think its unlikely 3 teams above us will lose their regional.
 
So are we locked in to play alabama or wash? What if 3 teams above us lose their regional but one of them is not alabama? Do we still move up and get to host? Or do we still play bama? I'd feel better about our chances if we were 9th, I think its unlikely 3 teams above us will lose their regional.

If we win our regional and Bama wins theirs, the Super Regional will be in Tuscaloosa. If we win our regional and anyone else wins the Bama regional, the Super Regional will be in Norman. If we don't win our regional, who cares at that point! :ez-roll:
 
Shelby is player of the year.

Paige is co-freshman of the year.

Patty is coach of the year.
 
There are no catchers on the first team. They can't leave off the player they are afraid to run against.
 
Looks like Lauren will be batting leadoff and Nicole batting in the ninth spot.
Parker batting third and Self is cleanup.
 
Back
Top