OSU Scandal

This is a magazine article, they don't have to have legal proof ( or NCAA proof) but have to have multiple sources and/or physical proof. Look at politics. How many times to magazines, TV shows, and even newspapers run with stories based on sources. This is the same situation. Enough sources with similar stories. They all may not be true, but something seems to have gone on.

Actually I would assume the SI legal department insists that they do have sufficient legal proof to avoid a defamation suit. This is not some little article. It accuses specific people of specific things. I seriously doubt most of those people are public figures as that term is used in defamation law. That term is important. For a public figure to succeed in a defamation suit they have to show actual malice rather than merely showing a false statement. People that are not public figures don't have to clear that high evidentiary standard. Given that I have never heard of many of these people, I suspect the SI legal team would conclude they are likely not public figures and that SI better be able to back up what it publishes.
 
If you want a good laugh read the comments on the article McJacknife posted.
 
He supposedly wrote a piece about texas that had some lies in it.

Traber was quoting some tweets about him saying he hated osu and texas and called them choklahoma state

Really? He published a false article and got to move on the NYT and SI? I doubt it.
 
Really? He published a false article and got to move on the NYT and SI? I doubt it.

exactly. he is hated in auburn, Austin, and now Stillwater. All b/c he wrote articles about them. I've asked for proof that he is shady or lied and nobody can find anything
 
The Drug one out today is bad for OSU, if true. I mean having players in Counseling with the leader not being licensed or studied for Drug Counceling. Also allowing them to test positive for drugs as long as the amount goes down and does not count against them. I certanily hope OU policy is different.
 
I certanily hope OU policy is different.

It may be, but pot use in college is crazy rampant.

I don't use. Never have. I don't condone use. But I've had to change my feelings on this some over the years, b/c the percent of college football/basketball players that do use, at least on a recreational basis, is probably higher than most want to admit. It's just the nature of society today. And it goes back to HS, where I think pot use is probably as rampant as at any time in our history.
 
The damaging part isn't that the players do drugs. The damaging part is the coaches and Athletic Department's attitude toward it. As long as the NCAA allows the schools to run their own drug testing programs, nothing will change. Until everyone, including stars, are treated the same, nothing will change. That goes for all schools.
 
Chris Mahr is the managing editor of Lost Lettermen. His column appears on Tuesdays and Thursdays. You can follow him on Twitter at @CMahrtian.[/B]


By Chris Mahr

Before embarking on my column, an extremely important disclaimer is necessary.

I spent three years and nine months as a publicity assistant at Sports Illustrated, from April 2008 to January 2012. The reason I decided to leave was to better pursue a career as a full-time writer.

To simply transition from the PR department at SI to editorial was not possible. There were scores of people already there ? Sports Illustrated is the type of name-brand publication where recent Columbia Journalism School graduates willingly work as temps ? more talented and more deserving of writing opportunities than I was.

I left with my boss' blessing as well as the best wishes of the editorial staff ? many of whom I got to know while doing PR work on their behalf and the occasions when they were generous enough to give me freelance assignments (most of which appeared in SI's commemorative issues).

In short: I hold no grudges to speak of when it comes to my former employer. An aspiring sports media professional couldn't have asked for a better first job out of college.

With that out of the way, I'd like to offer my perspective on SI's highly talked-about, five-part expose on a seemingly out-of-control Oklahoma State football program based on the nearly four years I spent doing PR for these kinds of stories.

When my boss Jim Weber penned his initial assessment of the OK State piece on Wednesday, he asked for me to read it over ? both for copy editing purposes and in the event that I had information to contribute that would make the piece more informed and balanced.

I can tell you all from firsthand experience that when Sports Illustrated embarks on these types of investigative pieces, they make sure that everything is air tight.

I recall spending several hours on Martin Luther King Day in 2011 working with both a member of the editorial staff and the legal department to make sure that a press release on a magazine piece concerning Lance Armstrong's alleged doping was worded in a way that didn't leave SI open to subsequent lawsuits. Imagine the measures that they take for the stories themselves.

Sure enough, the facts laid out in that Armstrong story were eventually verified. It was par for the course for the "enterprise reporting" department, the same one that busted Alex Rodriguez for steroid use, got former agent Josh Luchs to detail how he paid college players and revealed rules violations at Ohio State under ex-head coach Jim Tressel.

hat was the Sports Illustrated I was familiar with when I worked there. Then they made the mistake of hiring Pete Thamel and Thayer Evans.

When I heard last summer that my former employer had hired two of the most notorious s*it-stirrers in sports media, I was utterly perplexed for several reasons.

For starters, they joined Sports Illustrated mere weeks after 16 members of the editorial staff ? many of whom had been there for 10-20 years, if not longer ? had been let go. It was clearly a cost-cutting measure in response to decreasing newsstand sales (down 46% from 2007?2012) and the well-documented struggles of parent company Time Inc.

Yet there SI was in late July announcing that Thamel (formerly of The New York Times) and Evans (FOX Sports) ? neither of whom could have come cheaply ? were joining the staff.

Also curious about the timing of Thamel's and Evans' hiring is that it came less than a year after SI decided not to renew the contract of a writer with similar, often less-than-admirable qualities: Selena Roberts.

Roberts had arrived at Sports Illustrated not long after her well-publicized reporting on the Duke lacrosse case for the Times. In addition to blasting the university for "a culture that prohibited snitching," Roberts also accused the Blue Devils of sexism and racism in later articles. Even after the players were cleared of wrongdoing, Roberts didn't express remorse for what she wrote.

She enjoyed her fair share of success at SI ? she was the lead writer on both the aforementioned Armstrong and A-Rod stories ? but was more trouble than she was worth. There were too many instances of questionable reporting (an issue that reared its head again earlier this year with her attempted expose on Auburn football), and she left the magazine at the end of 2011.

When Roberts left, Sports Illustrated appeared to have expunged itself of a polarizing (and not always factually accurate) writer. Seven months later, they seeming replaced her with two doppelgangers.

And they had no need to. They already had some of the best investigative sports journalists (if not the best investigative sports journalists) in the business ? including the lead writer on the Oklahoma State story, George Dohrmann.

As many sports media wonks know, Dohrmann remains the last sportswriter to win a Pulitzer Prize, having been awarded the Beat Writing award while with the St. Paul Pioneer Press in 2000 for his work exposing academic fraud within Minnesota's men's basketball program. He was the lead writer for the aforementioned pieces on Luchs and Tressel, among many others. (My personal favorite of his is a criminally under-read and forgotten piece from 2007 on a crime wave among athletes at, of all places, Montana State University.)

Dohrmann has journalistic chops that are as big as, if not bigger than, those of Thamel and Evans. What's more, at no point during the times that I worked with Dohrmann ? emailing local and national media outlets about his stories, booking media interviews for him, etc. ? did he come across as antagonistic like Thamel and Evans often have. He was a cerebral guy who prided himself not on causing a stir but rather reporting on the facts.

Alas, Thamel and Evans have one thing that Dohrmann (and other Sports Illustrated writers) lacks: Widespread name recognition.

Thamel currently has over 88,000 Twitter followers to his name. Evans' SI account has just a little more than 11,000 but certainly has name recognition ? especially in SEC country after his work on the Can Newton investigation. Dohrmann? He's at a shade over 9,000.

Knowing that Thamel and Evans held this sway in the investigative sports journalism world and desperate to make a bold move amid flagging newsstand sales, Sports Illustrated lured them away from their respective former employers ? seemingly ready to deal with their polarizing ways.

Let's just say that Thamel and Evans likely won't have fond memories of their first year at SI.

Last fall, the duo was accused of bribing a source for their cover story on troubled LSU star Tyrann Mathieu to "say things that really didn't take place." In addition, Mathieu hired a law firm in an attempt to stop SI's interview requests.

Thamel's reputation took another hit in January. After it was made pretty clear in retrospect that Thamel should have spotted the fishiness of Notre Dame LB Manti Te'o's "relationship" with Lennay Kekua, SI.com was forced to publish the entirety of Thamel's September interview following the hoax's revelation.

Now it's Evans' turn to have his integrity questioned. When the story first broke, my first thought was how Sports Illustrated could have avoided all of this had Evans not been tabbed to help Dohrmann on the reporting for the story. My second thought: Where was David Epstein amid all of this?

Of all the writers I worked with at SI, Epstein was the most brilliant. He holds a B.S. from Columbia in environmental science and astronomy as well as master's degrees in journalism and environmental science from the school. He spent several years on the city desk at the New York Daily News, honing his investigative journalist chops.

That came in handy on the work he did on the A-Rod, Armstrong and Tressel stories. (He collaborated with Dohrmann on the lattermost one.) There were many other investigative stories he worked on as well. If the SI staff had any hopes for an enterprise journalism piece, it was almost a given that Epstein would be the one to do the reporting on it, if not serve as the lead writer.

For the Oklahoma State piece, however, Epstein evidently wasn't available. It appears as though he's taken on a reduced work load in 2013 in order to prepare for the August release of his now New York Times-bestselling book "The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance" (based on an award-winning Sports Illustrated piece from May 2010).

My guess is because of that and because SI wanted to justify their hiring of Thamel and Evans last summer, Evans was tabbed to be the reporter on the OK State story and not Epstein. It could prove to be a mistake with long-reaching and damaging consequences for my former employer after the massive backlash by former Oklahoma State players in the story questioning the journalistic integrity and accuracy involved in the reporting.

Unfortunately, my time at Sports Illustrated doesn't give me soothsaying powers to say what's coming next. I have enough of an attachment to the place and the brand that I'm hoping that all the facts laid out in the expose are proven true. There's been enough upheaval there over the past year and change where it feels like they're due for a much-needed win.

If they're wrong, I'll be left wondering what happened to who I used to work for and why.
 
Doug Bond played at Oklahoma State from 2002 into the spring of 2005. He was also among the key sources in Sports Illustrated’s first two articles. Wednesday, Bond talked with the Daily O’Collegian via telephone in attempt to share his side of the story. What follows is the complete transcript of the interview.

Bond: (Thayer Evans) wanted to know why top athletes were going to up-and-coming schools and then not making it. He wanted to know what our story was, not necessarily if we had been done wrong, but just whatever backgrounds we were coming from- why we weren’t making it.

He was basically trying to get a story from us.

Telling our story, not necessarily blaming us, but just explaining what happened with us, our thought process the whole time; how we viewed ourselves and things like that.

When he asked us a question, everything was from a general standpoint on Division-I athletes, and that’s how I was answering those questions.

Everything was from how athletes like myself who were in the doghouse or had that attitude or whatever, how we thought, why we thought the things we thought, and why that led us to being dismissed or whatever, you know?

He took those words, and he paraphrased a lot of those statements that I made to make it seem negative- the first article more than the second. The first article was almost like a sucker punch. He just threw my name in there, paraphrased a sentence where he has asked me about cheating.

I told him I had never seen, never heard of, or never taken anything. I made that extremely clear. I said that probably nine or 10 times during the conversation, as well. I said during the conversation nine or 10 times that I wasn’t blaming anybody for my dismissal. My thing was, I owned my mistakes and I’ve always owned up to that.

But for example, the sentence that he said, one of the quotes that was in there was, ‘They take care of their cats.’ (referring to OSU boosters paying players).

The whole sentence in that deal was I was saying that if there are schools that do that around the country, I’m sure they take care of their cats. I’ve never seen that (at OSU). That was my statement. My statement was paraphrased and used in a way to make it seem like I knew that was going on. And I’ve never seen any of that. Are you kidding me?

That’s really it. I’ve spoken to a couple of (other players interviewed), and they’ve all given me the same story.

Who have you spoken to?

I’ve spoken with Jonathan Cruz and Brad Girtman, and you know, Cruz was quoted in the article today, and he was extremely upset. We still consider ourselves Pokes.

It’s hard to explain. Even though we were dismissed, and we didn’t get to finish our career there, that’s where we started to become men.

Our experience with it was leaving there or staying and graduating there, it was pretty much a defining moment in all three of our lives.

When there are games on TV, when Gundy’s speaking, we always listen. You know, just with a happy heart because we consider ourselves Pokes even though we left there. And we would never, ever, say anything bad about the university or the football program, because nothing ever happened – not like how they’re claiming.

Nothing ever happened. We never saw any of that. From experiences of my own, from the horse’s mouth, I never saw anything. I made that explicitly clear to Mr. Evans, and he used my words to enforce some kind of personal cut he had against the university. The words I was using were completely taken out of representation of what our conversation was and what I thought the article was going to be about.

What can you tell me about your interview with Thayer Evans? When was it? Where was it? Did he make it clear it was recorded?

I spoke with him sometime during last November. He called me over the phone. I don’t know how he found me, because he found my sister’s number and he called her. I’m not exactly sure how he found her number, but he was able to go through whatever means and found my number through my sister. My sister called me, and said, ‘Some guy wants to talk to you from Sports Illustrated or whatever.’

I gave him a call just to see what’s going on, because I’m not exactly sure why he would be contacting me, so we spoke over the phone, and that was it. We spoke over the phone, and he told me what he was writing about.

I have a passion for that topic just because I’d like to be a coach. I’m working to be a coach right now, as a matter of a fact. I want to go affect the guys who are like I was back in the day. Does that make sense? I’d like to help those guys, and I know how to do it. I’ve got a master’s degree in counseling and human development, so I could learn any type of hurdle, whether it be cultural, coming from their background, whatever, you know, I’d have some type of insight to who this guy is and why he may see reality in a certain way.

When I talked to (Evans), I was extremely passionate about what I was saying. I didn’t meet him anywhere, I talked to him on the phone. If he told me it was recorded, I don’t remember him saying it was recorded, but I can’t give you a for sure fact that he did or didn’t say that. I knew he was writing things down, but I told him over and over and over again that first, it wasn’t Gundy.

It wasn’t Gundy, I said.

I felt like the black cloud lifted up off the team, off the program, once Gundy got in office. That was the best thing that ever happened to Oklahoma State. I told him, ‘I’m trusting you with my story. I do not want you to print anything or release anything until I see it.’

I said I also don’t want my name in there. I’m not doing this to get any recognition. What I’m doing is putting my story out there in case there’s any other athletes out there going through what I was going through, and maybe they’ll read this and it’ll help him.

I specifically told him that.

He broke everything he said he wouldn’t do.

You mentioned Gundy. What was the biggest difference between the Gundy era and the Les Miles era?

I don’t want to get into anything.

Not necessarily comparing the two coaches and making it sound like I’m downing one and lifting the other. You have to understand my experience was from a 19- or 20-year-old child. There were certain things I didn’t understand that were happening to me that happened, and the reason certain things were happening was because it was the best thing for the program.

I have to say it’s just coaching styles. That’s pretty much all that it really was. But I’ve already got some quotes out there that got me a little bit down, so I’d like to be careful if you don’t mind.

Just so we’re clear, you said Gundy lifted a “black cloud.” What did you mean by “black cloud?”

I guess I’m more or less talking from my standpoint; I’ll put it like that. I was a guy, like I said, who was immature. I came in physically ready to play. I could have played as a true freshman. I just mentally wasn’t ready to be a student-athlete at a Division-I program.

I had bad grades the whole time I was there. I was barely passing. I just felt bummed.

Being excused was the best thing that ever happened in my life. When I said, “lifted the black cloud,” I felt like I had a new beginning, because I knew what Gundy stood for. I knew he was about football. Playing the best football, and I had a sense that Gundy really cared about the person behind the pads, you know?

It just felt like I had a new beginning. I really did, I just messed an opportunity up. I got on board too late. But like I said, that moment (when I was dismissed from Oklahoma State) really forced me to become a man. And I finished out and graduated from Northeastern State, went and got my master’s at Hardin-Simmons, and you know, it really forced me to step up to the plate. I’ve always maintained that if I would have been Gundy and he would have been me, I would have excused me from the team as well.

My mindset was so negative, just from letting myself get that way and not having the insight or the maturity level to be able to receive coaching or whatever. That’s just what I did to myself, but it was a learning experience that I needed, and I wouldn’t be in the position I’m in if I didn’t have it.

Just so I have the facts straight, why exactly were you excused from the team?

Grades. My grades were bad. I had been on academic probation so many times, you know. When you come in as a new coach and you’ve got some guys who didn’t make it or are frustrated with the program or aren’t buying in or what not, you give them a certain amount of time, you know?

When you give them a certain amount of time, you say, ‘this is what I’m doing.’ (Gundy) gave us a whole spring. I was with him through spring of ’05, I believe that’s correct. Anybody who was dismissed after that, we just couldn’t quite get on board. For me, I was almost there, I really was.

But being dismissed was the best thing for me. It brought reality, you know? I’ve been successful ever since that.

Your overall opinion of these articles so far—are they completely false? Is there any basis? What’s your take?

Like I said, I have never, ever seen – I’ll put it to you this way – the reason I came to Oklahoma State was because I felt like it was a big family atmosphere.

I felt like all the players truly enjoy each other. They were a true team. I wanted to be a part of that because my of high school atmosphere. I was used to that. I knew how to operate in that atmosphere. And when I got here it was no different; it was even better than I had thought.

I’m telling you this, when we all hung out, it was basically the team hanging out together. I never, ever saw — when you start talking about Tatum Bell and all these guys (Sports Illustrated is) saying got all this money and new cars and whatever — never saw it.

Ever. Never, ever.

Didn’t even hear a rumor about it. When we were there, it was all football. I never even heard a rumor about anything like that.

These other guys quoted so far — do you think they’re all being misquoted, or maybe a couple of them have beef with the program, or what’s the deal?

The thing about it, I can only speak for me. I know a lot of people were just frustrated from their experience as a player, but they love Oklahoma State. The guys that I keep in contact with, we all hold the exact same things, that we are completely responsible for whatever we did to be dismissed or not finish our career there: every last one of us.

We all recognize we were young and had negative attitudes at the time, and we probably missed a prime opportunity to do something in that game.

But that regret, that experience has been the fuel to our fire since then. Just speaking for myself, truly, there’s such crazy claims. Are you kidding me? $25,000 a year they were making? No way.

I remember the time we were getting our scholarship checks and they were like $70. You can tell when somebody’s struggling. Everybody’s going through the exact same thing. Going to the Dollar Tree and getting tuna and spam and things like that, you know.

I’ve never seen it. Whether it happened, maybe I was too naïve to see it, but I never saw it. Never heard about it. And somebody was going to talk. You’re talking about kids in college, they’re not actually grown men yet. Somebody would say something, they bought something.

What about the academic part of it and the other allegations set to come out with drugs and sex?

Let me start. Mr. Evans, when I was talking with him, I said Marilyn (Middlebrook) and Terry (Henley) and the whole staff over there was one of the best academic staffs in the entire country. Because they truly cared about you.

They didn’t just want you to get a good grade. They cared about how you were doing. They are so against anything like cheating. If that had been the case — let me tell you something — as a true freshman, I was starting- I had a starting position. I believe one of the offensive linemen was out with bad grades or injury or something. I earned a starting position. I was set to start against Louisiana Tech, but they took me out because the guy either became healthy or eligible again.

And if that would have been the case, grades were being slanted, I would never had a problem at Oklahoma State. They are so against cheating or doing anything like that. They care enough to where they’ll come knock on your dorm room if they know that you missed tutoring. That’s how much they cared.

They’ll come find you in the morning before meetings or whatever and be upset with you not just because they have to tell a coach that you didn’t come, but they were upset just because they care about your wellbeing.

If anything like was going on, papers getting written for anyone or whatever, it was behind closed doors. So I can’t say somebody was aware of it. They wouldn’t have stood for it.

One other part of the accusations against Joe Deforest is he had a (bonus) program , had players work at his house illegally. I would assume you’re going to refute that too or had no idea of it?

Yeah. I don’t know anything about it to be honest with you. Coach DeForest, I really didn’t deal with him too much because I was on offense. Coach (Mollard) was the guy I was closer to. I was just an average screw-up.

I wasn’t out partying — well, I wasn’t out getting in trouble while I was partying. I wasn’t getting into bar fights or showing up to practice drunk, I was just stupid: young and dumb.

But I never saw Coach DeForest or anyone giving money.

Let me tell you something — this drug section is coming up. Also, too the sex, Orange Pride girls and what not. When I was there, I was going through a pretty good depression.

At that point in time, just to handle it, I went out and smoked some weed. I failed a couple of drugs tests. And I was handled the right way. I was sent to the counselor or whatever. After speaking to a couple of guys, you know, I’m pretty sure that (Sports Illustrated) is going to come out and say something about how so many guys were told it was OK to do whatever, and that never, ever happened.

When you failed the drug test, what exactly happened when you met with coaches and/or counselors?

I can’t remember so far as the exact steps, but I know the steps were followed that were laid out in the program guidelines. I met with coach, he told me what was going—

Who exactly did you meet with?

Coach Miles. And the head athletic trainer. I met with him and it was, you now, they said they were going to send me to a drug counselor, and her name was Peggy. Peggy and I talked. By about then, when I was getting over that – I don’t want to give you my story because I don’t want this to be about me – I want this to be about that I loved the university and what was said wasn’t right.

At the time I was going through that depression — it was probably almost a year, between 2003 and 2004, that was one of the lowest times of my life. But after I got over that, just a young kid trying to find himself, you know.

In summary?

I’m very disappointed in what was said. We were all trying to give our stories, because if it starts to get recognized more in coaches’ minds and in players’ minds about where players are coming from and their maturity level — there are a lot of guys who would make it. A lot of guys for whom that light bulb would click on, and they would start to understand. A lot of guys miss out on that because wherever they came from and how they did things really collides with how the real world really is. That’s what we thought we were giving, and it didn’t turn out like that at all.
 
Chris Mahr is the managing editor of Lost Lettermen. His column appears on Tuesdays and Thursdays. You can follow him on Twitter at @CMahrtian.[/B]

In reading the article, Mahr appears to be a straight up guy who doesn't have an ax to grind with OSU or SI. It's easy for me to believe that he may be right in his assertion that Thamel and Evans didn't always follow what we would call totally ethical channels in digging up these stories.

But, the fact remains that, according to what Dorhmann told Doug Gotlieb in his interview, SI's execs and legal staff were very careful to dot every I and cross every T. I can't imagine that any national publication would be so desperate for a story that everyone on their staff would be willing to sign on to printing a lot of crap that can't be substantiated.

That's not to say that everything we've read and will read is spot on accurate. I definitely have my doubts about that. Still, there is so much to the first two parts of this report, one would think that OSU fans have to be worried as well as thoroughly pissed off to know that a number of coaches and school officials might have looked the other way when these atrocities occurred. Even if half of what has been and will be reported is true, this has to be very concerning for everyone associated with OSU. I know I would be if I was an OSU fan.

For the record, I hope none of it is true. Not because I have any love for OSU, but because the adverse publicity has already been embarrassing for the state of Oklahoma. There are no winners here, especially if some of these stories are proven to be accurate. It's bad for our state, it's bad for OU and it's bad for the Big 12 Conference.
 
When all the articles are out OSU will be going on an all out assalt on SI's credibility. Most of it will be done through surrogates and former players but the university will have some pretty strong statements.

From everything I know, just from alumni and donors, SI has got a lot of explaining to do. Almost all the players "quoted" in the report are willing to waive their right to confidentiality so SI has no legal basis to withhold the tapes. If SI refuses to release them it will totally destroy their credibility.

This is far from over but I can tell you that every OSU person I know doesn't believe 90% of it and until this came out no one even heard rumor of this stuff. You can't keep something like this secret from alumni and donors. A lot of them have had kids in the program.

If everything is proven true then OSU deserves to be hammered but I've seen nothing but out of context quotes and sour grapes from players who washed out.
 
From everything I know, just from alumni and donors, SI has got a lot of explaining to do. Almost all the players "quoted" in the report are willing to waive their right to confidentiality so SI has no legal basis to withhold the tapes. If SI refuses to release them it will totally destroy their credibility.

I do agree with this. Just typed this up and was ready to post before I saw yours:

I agree that this story seems kind of sketchy. And Evans isn't helping himself with his past articles against OSU. It definitely creates a cloud of credibility and I'm surprised SI would put him on the project.

That being said, Evans didn't just compile these quotes and throw them in the magazine by himself. The author (George Dohrmann) won a Pulitizer for his work, and he's been sued (and won) for similar work in an SI article involving UCLA basketball. That guy, and SI, aren't running those quotes if they aren't thoroughly vetted.

Dohrmann has tweeted and said in an interview on the Gotlieb show that they have recordings of all these players claiming they weren't talked to or were taken out of context. He also said those tapes have been reviewed by multiple editors and lawyers from SI.

My guess is that these players spilled the beans and then once they realized it was for an SI cover story, they're trying to distance themselves from what they said to avoid legal issues. I don't buy the excuse some of these guys are using when they say the reporter "misled me on what the story was about" or whatever. They still talked, and talked very specifically about events at OSU. I haven't seen anyone saying the reporter put a gun to their head ... at least not yet. :eek:

At this point though, if I'm SI I'm putting those recordings online. If Evans did most of the investigative work, I think his past negative articles on OSU justifies that we need to hear them. Maybe they will at some point.

All I know is I just couldn't sit there and listen to my rep get blasted like this if I had it backed up with recordings, as is claimed. And I'm talking about the named sources in the story, not the anonymous former assistant coaches. The recordings of those coaches will never be heard.

I would be absolutely shocked if these recordings showed SI manipulated quotes. That author has already won a Pulitizer. Not sure what else there is to gain by doing that. But I guess nothing in the sports world is shocking anymore. It will be interesting to see how it unfolds.
 
That Doug Bond interview is strong evidence that the story is true. The guy is full of inconsistencies and contradictions. He would be ripped to shreds during any cross examination.

Lets see ... OSU is an awesome family atmosphere, way better than he even expected, with unbelievable academic support, running a tight ship and he wasn't out partying ... with a black cloud over it, causing him to be depressed, failing drug tests, flunking out, etc.

What a dope. Obviously Evans tricked them into fessing up by faking that his story was about something else. As for those tapes? You want to hear them? Go ahead and sue only to be humiliated in court. SI has no obligation to release them nor should they.
 
That Doug Bond interview is strong evidence that the story is true. The guy is full of inconsistencies and contradictions. He would be ripped to shreds during any cross examination.

Lets see ... OSU is an awesome family atmosphere, way better than he even expected, with unbelievable academic support, running a tight ship and he wasn't out partying ... with a black cloud over it, causing him to be depressed, failing drug tests, flunking out, etc.

What a dope. Obviously Evans tricked them into fessing up by faking that his story was about something else. As for those tapes? You want to hear them? Go ahead and sue only to be humiliated in court. SI has no obligation to release them nor should they.

I'd be very surprised if OSU is really serious about forcing SI to release those tapes. Doing so could open a can of worms that has the potential to make things worse than they are now. The former players in those interviews can claim they were misquoted or say anything they want and it's their word against what SI is reporting. Releasing the tapes would put a stop to the rhetoric and prove once and for all who is lying. If it's SI, which I doubt, the former players deserve their "day in court."
 
I'd be very surprised if OSU is really serious about forcing SI to release those tapes. Doing so could open a can of worms that has the potential to make things worse than they are now. The former players in those interviews can claim they were misquoted or say anything they want and it's their word against what SI is reporting. Releasing the tapes would put a stop to the rhetoric and prove once and for all who is lying. If it's SI, which I doubt, the former players deserve their "day in court."

What is it that trial lawyers always say: Never ask a question if you don't already know what the answer will be.
 
What a dope. Obviously Evans tricked them into fessing up by faking that his story was about something else. As for those tapes? You want to hear them? Go ahead and sue only to be humiliated in court. SI has no obligation to release them nor should they.

Exactly how I feel about it.
 
When all the articles are out OSU will be going on an all out assalt on SI's credibility. Most of it will be done through surrogates and former players but the university will have some pretty strong statements.

From everything I know, just from alumni and donors, SI has got a lot of explaining to do. Almost all the players "quoted" in the report are willing to waive their right to confidentiality so SI has no legal basis to withhold the tapes. If SI refuses to release them it will totally destroy their credibility.

This is far from over but I can tell you that every OSU person I know doesn't believe 90% of it and until this came out no one even heard rumor of this stuff. You can't keep something like this secret from alumni and donors. A lot of them have had kids in the program.

If everything is proven true then OSU deserves to be hammered but I've seen nothing but out of context quotes and sour grapes from players who washed out.
lol.

The really sign will be if OSU sues or if any of the ex players sue. If not, guilty as charged
 
exactly...who would you side with? An award winning writer or ex athletes who were dumb enough to think that spilling their guts about being paid for their performances, academic fraud to stay eligible and girls having sex with recruits was part of a positive story about the football program?

fify ;)
 
Back
Top