DFWHoopster
New member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2009
- Messages
- 969
- Reaction score
- 0
I am going to take exception with all who rated Sadler higher than Drew. The question by BigTime was to rank the big 12 coaches in terms of results, x and o, recruiting, running a program, etc...
Doc's record at Nebraska:
2006–2007 Nebraska 17-14 6-10 8th
2007–2008 Nebraska 20-12 7-9 7th NIT 2nd Round
2008–2009 Nebraska 18-13 8-8 8th NIT 1st Round
Drew's record at Baylor:
2003–2004 Baylor 8-21 3-13 11th —
2004–2005 Baylor 9-19 1-15 12th —
2005–2006 Baylor 4-13 4-12 12th —
2006–2007 Baylor 15-16 4-12 11th —
2007–2008 Baylor 21-11 9-7 T–4th NCAA First Round
2008–2009 Baylor 24-15 5-11 9th NIT Runner-up
Obviously Drew's first 3 years at Baylor were as tough a situation as anyone has ever inherited. Your 3 best players (Taylor, Lucas, Roberts) have immediate eligibility at other schools. You are playing 5 walk-ons regularly.
So comparing the last three years to Doc's three years is a fair comparison. Results are pretty much a wash, wouldn't you agree?
Now, I think objectively you have to say the South is tougher than the North and give Drew a slight edge there.
Drew versus Sadler recruiting- no comparison. The future is bright for Baylor because of talent inflow- 8 top 100 national players currently on their roster. And two 5-star prospects coming: Perry Jones and Dragan Sekelja. Sadler is not getting players that will lead to success.
It is not like there is a revolving door either- Drew is doing a good job of running a program from the standpoint of getting quality kids and graduating them. Sadler seems to turnover his roster much more frequently.
I think Sadler is a great x and o guy. Maybe one of the top 3 in the conference. But if you are considering the whole package, any objective person (which I am not but I think I can use common sense) would give the nod to Drew.
Doc's record at Nebraska:
2006–2007 Nebraska 17-14 6-10 8th
2007–2008 Nebraska 20-12 7-9 7th NIT 2nd Round
2008–2009 Nebraska 18-13 8-8 8th NIT 1st Round
Drew's record at Baylor:
2003–2004 Baylor 8-21 3-13 11th —
2004–2005 Baylor 9-19 1-15 12th —
2005–2006 Baylor 4-13 4-12 12th —
2006–2007 Baylor 15-16 4-12 11th —
2007–2008 Baylor 21-11 9-7 T–4th NCAA First Round
2008–2009 Baylor 24-15 5-11 9th NIT Runner-up
Obviously Drew's first 3 years at Baylor were as tough a situation as anyone has ever inherited. Your 3 best players (Taylor, Lucas, Roberts) have immediate eligibility at other schools. You are playing 5 walk-ons regularly.
So comparing the last three years to Doc's three years is a fair comparison. Results are pretty much a wash, wouldn't you agree?
Now, I think objectively you have to say the South is tougher than the North and give Drew a slight edge there.
Drew versus Sadler recruiting- no comparison. The future is bright for Baylor because of talent inflow- 8 top 100 national players currently on their roster. And two 5-star prospects coming: Perry Jones and Dragan Sekelja. Sadler is not getting players that will lead to success.
It is not like there is a revolving door either- Drew is doing a good job of running a program from the standpoint of getting quality kids and graduating them. Sadler seems to turnover his roster much more frequently.
I think Sadler is a great x and o guy. Maybe one of the top 3 in the conference. But if you are considering the whole package, any objective person (which I am not but I think I can use common sense) would give the nod to Drew.
Last edited: