sherri does need to get rid of her shipp and kittle on her staff and get some people who can recruit and question her strategy at times.
this
sherri does need to get rid of her shipp and kittle on her staff and get some people who can recruit and question her strategy at times.
78 put down the gun and step back from the edge of the window before you hurt yourself. Life is not going to co e to end because Sherri has a really bad season once in 10 years. Not of us are happy with this year, we all, including you, expected a Big 12 champion but for what ever reason it's not there. I have been around OU for longer than most on this board and believe me Sherri is pulling her hair out trying to figure out why.. Look at the bright side, the season is almost over
Very good. I'll put you on the same ignore list as gary.
Romulus, don't make comments without thinking. Look at Sherri's record and the circumstances under which she achieved that record. Look at Lon's record. Her record is a bit better. Now, you don't want to say that he knows more than Sherri because he is male. Do you? Basketball isn't too difficult for the feminine mind. I suspect that Sherri and Lon would have a great deal of respect for one another.Lon has coached on the highest level of basketball. I'd take a gander if Lon coached women's basketball he'd be on the level of the little fellow in Connecticut.
Romulus, don't make comments without thinking. Look at Sherri's record and the circumstances under which she achieved that record. Look at Lon's record. Her record is a bit better. Now, you don't want to say that he knows more than Sherri because he is male. Do you? Basketball isn't too difficult for the feminine mind. I suspect that Sherri and Lon would have a great deal of respect for one another.
Don't take a position in a discussion without thinking. Women's basketball and men's basketball are different. You could compared Sherri's record with another women's coach and make a case who was the best. You can not, when in a state of sanity, compare accomplishments in women's basketball with accomplishments in men's basketball and make any such judgment.
That would be like comparing a Courtney Paris stat with a Blake Griffin stat and trying to make the case Courtney was a better player. That would be stupid. Wouldn't it?
It is always intriguing to see who thinks they have credibility.
Go look at their records of having been to the Final Four or Sweet Sixteen.
Lon is excellent. Sherri's record is superb.
My old friend, just drop the mic and walk off stageA bevy of stupid posts in this thread and this is at the top.
Womens basketball has about 2-3 teams every year that are very good. After that, it has about 80 that are pretty even. Mens basketball has about 15-20 teams every year that are very good, about 40 on the next level and then 40 more the level just below that.
In mens basketball, upsets occur often, in womens basketball they seldom occur.
In mens basketball you need a good starting 5 to be competitive, in womens basketball if you have 1 good player you have a good to great team (OU with CP, Baylor with the girl last year, etc.). In womens basketball, if you have 4-5 great players, you will dominate the sport (UConn). In mens basketball, you can have 4-5 great players and still not dominate (Phi Slamma Jamma).
The UConn coach is the best womens coach of all time. If he coached mens basketball, most likely he would not be in the top tier of coaches and most probably on the same tier or lower than Lon. Womens basketball is mainly about schemes, or X's and O's and then talent. He gets more talent than anyone so combine his schemes with the talent he gets and that equals dominate program. In mens basketball, he would struggle to get the level of talent he needs to win 1 NC, much less multiples. Schemes in mens basketball help less talented teams compete, think Princeton back in the day, or Northwestern a few years back. Very little talent but great schemes. How many NCAA tournament games did those programs win? ZERO.
I could go further but you get my point.
Sherri is a good coach and has done a great job with the program but she can't seem to take it to the next level. Mulkey has taken Baylor to the next level. They have 3 NC's and Sherri has 0. Baylor has 4-5 final 4's, Sherri has 3. I am no fan of Mulkey but I can admit she's a great coach, a better coach than Sherri and the results prove it.
As others have mentioned, Sherri needs to make some changes in her staff to help get to the next level. If that doesn't work then the OU admin, alumni, and fans, need to decide if 2nd and 3rd place finishes in the Big 12 and sweet 16 runs every 3 years with a final four every 6-7 years is acceptable to them? To me, I'm ok with that as long as she keeps producing at that rate, but if she has many more years like this with a preseason #1 club and struggles to stay in the top half of the league, then maybe she needs to look elsewhere.
A bevy of stupid posts in this thread and this is at the top.
Womens basketball has about 2-3 teams every year that are very good. After that, it has about 80 that are pretty even. Mens basketball has about 15-20 teams every year that are very good, about 40 on the next level and then 40 more the level just below that.
In mens basketball, upsets occur often, in womens basketball they seldom occur.
In mens basketball you need a good starting 5 to be competitive, in womens basketball if you have 1 good player you have a good to great team (OU with CP, Baylor with the girl last year, etc.). In womens basketball, if you have 4-5 great players, you will dominate the sport (UConn). In mens basketball, you can have 4-5 great players and still not dominate (Phi Slamma Jamma).
The UConn coach is the best womens coach of all time. If he coached mens basketball, most likely he would not be in the top tier of coaches and most probably on the same tier or lower than Lon. Womens basketball is mainly about schemes, or X's and O's and then talent. He gets more talent than anyone so combine his schemes with the talent he gets and that equals dominate program. In mens basketball, he would struggle to get the level of talent he needs to win 1 NC, much less multiples. Schemes in mens basketball help less talented teams compete, think Princeton back in the day, or Northwestern a few years back. Very little talent but great schemes. How many NCAA tournament games did those programs win? ZERO.
I could go further but you get my point.
Sherri is a good coach and has done a great job with the program but she can't seem to take it to the next level. Mulkey has taken Baylor to the next level. They have 3 NC's and Sherri has 0. Baylor has 4-5 final 4's, Sherri has 3. I am no fan of Mulkey but I can admit she's a great coach, a better coach than Sherri and the results prove it.
As others have mentioned, Sherri needs to make some changes in her staff to help get to the next level. If that doesn't work then the OU admin, alumni, and fans, need to decide if 2nd and 3rd place finishes in the Big 12 and sweet 16 runs every 3 years with a final four every 6-7 years is acceptable to them? To me, I'm ok with that as long as she keeps producing at that rate, but if she has many more years like this with a preseason #1 club and struggles to stay in the top half of the league, then maybe she needs to look elsewhere.
A lot of goofy things being said in this thread. The quote above is the goofiest.Proud, you too are one of the sunshine pumpers on this board that most of us give no credibility to - FYI.
Having now placed three more who think they know basketball on ignore, the board looks a bit better. Personal attacks only advance positions in politics.
All I see are three more that I will put on ignore.
Since there are now five on my Ignore list, I can't actually see this post. But, I did enjoy a quip on the men's board from a couple of days ago. Why would someone select a bodily excretion as a user name? I couldn't say it any better.
Since there are now five on my Ignore list, I can't actually see this post. But, I did enjoy a quip on the men's board from a couple of days ago. Why would someone select a bodily excretion as a user name? I couldn't say it any better.