I think everyone realizes the pitching in the WCWS is much better than what we see in the regular season.
I don't think anyone expects us to be scoring 8, 10 or 12 runs each game.
I think people also think we shouldn't lose games 1 - 0.
But 1 - 0 would have won the 1st Alabama game and that raises red flags for some people.
I noticed the graphic they put up that showed the number of players who had won multiple player of the year awards. The first one they showed was Cat Osterman. She won the award 3 times and I don't think Texas won a sincle NC while she was there. At that time, if you could score one run against Texas you were in good shape. If you could score 2, you were golden. Because Texas couldn't score worth a damn.
I've said many times that I'm not a softball expert. I would come closer to understanding Einstein's theory of relativity than understanding how a batter can hit to a certain spot on the field or how a pitcher can make a ball curve, drop or rise.
Lastly, we had the best offense in football last year but couldn't win an NC because we weren't a complete team. We want this softball team to be a complete team, playing to the best of their ability in all phases of the game.
Having said that, UCLA looks very, very good. We will have to be on top of our game to beat them even once, much less twice.
Don't disagree with much you said, Proud, but I do take exception to the part where you stated, "I don't think anyone expects us to be scoring 8, 10 or 12 runs each game."
Many Oklahoma fans, including a sizable portion of this board, absolutely expect the Sooners to score 8-12 runs per game, and those fans will always express their displeasure and criticize the players/coaches whenever that doesn't happen. Teams will seldom win every game against the kind of pitching they see in the WCWS. I think we do a disservice to Patty and her players when we criticize them for losing an occasional game (whether it's 1-0 or 10-9) against a team with the position players, pitching, coaching and tradition of Alabama.
I agree that UCLA looks (and is) very good. But I believe it's a tad over the top to say we will have to perform at the very top of our game just to have a chance to beat the Bruins one time. I would contend that UCLA is the team that better be at the top of its game if the Bruins expect to defeat the Oklahoma Sooners and claim the national title. JMO