Some +/- numbers

[oudna]

https://twitter.com/ryaber/status/810505877459439617

After an inquiry by @44dmj last week, here’s some +/- numbers for #Sooners hoops through yesterday: Woodard 98, McNeace 76, Freeman 56 …

#Sooners +/- continued: Shepherd 45, Doolittle 30, Odomes 24, James 17, Strong-Moore 13, Lattin 4, Buford -4

 

[JBaker]

Not trying to argue that Buford is an all-conference player, but his number is skewed by not playing against some of our weaker opponents.

 

[oudna]

I agree. Lattin's number is very surprising. If I recall last year he was one of the best.

 

[Larry72]

Very interesting Thanks

 

[vbdad]

Lattin has to stay on the court and has to play better than he is.

 

[ChongoChingi]

So does that mean they should start Woodard, McNeace, Freeman, Shepherd, and Doolittle?

 

[oudna]

Crazy thing about Lattin's poor number is how man minutes he's logged with Woodard. He should be better just by association.

 

[SoonerBounce13]

I'd like to see how shepard, woodard, james, doolittle, mcnease lineup does

 

[MercedeSooner]

I'd like to see the +/- when we played real competition which are the 5 games that we went 1-4 in. I don't care so much about guys lighting it up against No. Colorado.

 

[chuckb]

Lattin has to stay on the court and has to play better than he is.

Basically, I agree with this. Our struggles are related to how poorly he's played.