StoopsBros
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,844
- Reaction score
- 10,757
and that is just the tourney ..
Wow, I do NOT see how that guy is worth near that kind of money. This crap needs to balance out at some point.Not that I thought Aberdeen was a legit option or anything but...
View attachment 2714
"at least $1.5 mill" says Trilly. Not a terrible price. Basically what OU's paying both Davis and Pack each. But yeah, not a need for OU at that price.
yeah it will "balance" by all the money going up across the boardWow, I do NOT see how that guy is worth near that kind of money. This crap needs to balance out at some point.
Wow, I do NOT see how that guy is worth near that kind of money. This crap needs to balance out at some point.
But why? Why would the approach be to save money at the position that has been our biggest weakness?There are still a lot of power/forward center types that could be backups in the portal….may be waiting for the dust to settle a bit so not to spend a lot of money on that position
"barely in the top 100"Bob P saying that our portal “strategy” shows that Moser has lots of confidence in Rogers. Who knows if that’s true or just covering, but if he really is gambling on a freshman barely in the top 100 to come in and solve a four-year problem, that is the type of gamble that could cost you your job if it doesn’t pay off.
We have had multiple higher rated recruits who barely saw the floor for most/all of their freshman season under Moser. Regardless of whether we find a dollar store backup, I will be surprised if he averages more than 4-5 pts."barely in the top 100"![]()
![]()
You will go to any length to make something sound negative...I applaud your consistency. Assuming he ends up being the 2nd Center in the rotation, what is your guess on what his freshmen stats will look like?
I’ll say it again, Bob knows nothing. He has no clue about what Porters strategy is. None.Bob P saying that our portal “strategy” shows that Moser has lots of confidence in Rogers. Who knows if that’s true or just covering, but if he really is gambling on a freshman barely in the top 100 to come in and solve a four-year problem, that is the type of gamble that could cost you your job if it doesn’t pay off.
You're certainly not a glass 3/4 full but 1/4 empty guyNot a portal update but not worthy of a new thread: ESPN updated their high school rankings and they have Blair in the 50s and Rogers in the 80s. It didn't have any analysis, just the rankings. I am not convinced Blair will turn down the baseball draft, and am certainly not counting on Rogers being a difference maker as a freshman.
That guy drinks out of a no tip Timmy cup. No glass involved.You're certainly not a glass 3/4 full but 1/4 empty guy
You mean the Tulsa year in which he led the conference in win shares?He had a good supporting cast playing in a 1 bid league. They had some good wins. Bounced out of NCAA tournament 1st game and he Bombers. Take a gleen at his Tulsa year……
Right on. Clown going to clown. Boomer"barely in the top 100"![]()
![]()
You will go to any length to make something sound negative...I applaud your consistency. Assuming he ends up being the 2nd Center in the rotation, what is your guess on what his freshmen stats will look like?
More like a broken tea cup. BoomerYou're certainly not a glass 3/4 full but 1/4 empty guy
Yea… no doubt that he is a good player. Very ball dominant and is a volume scorer.Not worth that to most programs. Still wouldn’t say his game doesn’t “equate to wins”.