Voepel on Texas

I initially was replying to the required "bible study" that has been thrown out on this board for years as another supposed fact to bash Sherri and the program. Yet, on appearances, the softball coach and program is just as "religious", or even moreso, yet no bashing of Patty.

The second comment was just a general statement of bewilderment but nothing that you stated.

I don't believe she has a required bible study. It would be illegal. I do believe many of the athletes go to bible study, whether with their teammates or also with members of other university sports teams.
 
I am facebook friends with 2 of the players I'm talking about, but I don't see anything disgusting about saying some one is dressing masculine.

I live in the San Francisco Bay area I support the LGBT community..

It was the implication that someone who was dressing more masculine is a stereotype of being a lesbian not that "someone" was dressing masculine. The dress and/or mannerisms of an individual are not indicative of someone's sexual orientation.
 
I don't believe she has a required bible study. It would be illegal. I do believe many of the athletes go to bible study, whether with their teammates or also with members of other university sports teams.

I don't believe she does either nor do I believe Patty requires. But over the history of this board, there are those that bring this up as fact periodically as another reason to bash Sherri. As much as Boren and Castiglione love Sherri AND Patty, they would never allow this to be a requirement of being a team member on any program within the university. As you state, it would be illegal.
 
Back
Top