Maverick008
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 396
- Reaction score
- 211
OU has not been a "bottom feeder" if the down cycle of OU basketball is back to back NCAA tourney appearances ..winning a game in the NCAA and then losing the the ncaa champion
then that is a GOOD thing
the amount of negativity.... is truly amazing.... and frankly sad ..
This is what I’ve been trying to figure out about some of the posters on this board. What is good enough? Would what KSU did this year be good enough? They tied for 1st then lost in the first round of the NCAA tourney. How would that sit with this group? Some will point to Wade being hurt but others already said we shouldn’t use injuries as an excuse because that clearly points to lack of depth for the program (I’m somewhat joking but this was pointed out by other posters when talking about OU’s injury history).
So back to the question if OU had KSU’s season last year would some of those posters consider that a success due to finishing at the top of the league or a failure for losing in the first round of the NCAA tourney?
I get wanting to compete for the league title but if things don’t go the team’s way for some reason or another and they finish 5th but make a run in the tournament to like the sweet 16 or elite 8 is that a success? I would think so but some of the posters here wouldn’t make you feel that way