I'm not sure the first part of this statement is ENTIRELY true and it would make for nice debate. The second part is a work in progress. KD certainly didn't set the ENTIRE NBA, it's coaches, fans, players and media on it's ear like BG has in his rookie season...but, KD is, at this point, the superior player...
1. As freshmen, KD was way better than BG I can't find where the term freshman was used
2. BG went thru 2 NBA offseason training camps before playing in the NBA.
3. KD was POY as a freshman. again, I didn't see freshman mentioned
4. KD is the leading scorer in the NBA not sure what the rub is, I said "at this poiint"
But lets not get away from the main point..How good each were as a freshmen in college...and the answer is KD all the way.
I look at our coach and see that he got it done w/ a great player...while Barnes couldn't get out of the 2nd round w/ a great player.
It was implied...since we were comparing what they did at their schools.
Both are bad but 30 points sounds a lot worse than 19.
:ez-roll:
We're really getting scientific now.
I think its funny that earlier in this thread people were coming down on Capel for playing Neal when his shot wasn't falling, but a few weeks ago, people were coming down on Capel for not playing Neal enough. I think Neal needs to play a bunch, as he will be one of our key reserves next year. Sometimes your shot just doesn't fall. If Hollis Price had missed 6-8 shots in a row, would you have wanted to yank him?(and yes, I know, Neal isn't Price).
It was implied...since we were comparing what they did at their schools.