WVU most certainly lost because of a bad matchup.
I thought so as well. SFA was prepared and Walkup was fantastic. He took over the game and WVU could not frustrate him. Once you have that you are in good shape against WVU - their offense is not going to scare you. SFA D is also good.
I wish Walkup was on our team. If your team does not have a guy like him then WVU is at least going to scare.
wasn't he 19/20 from the FT line? that means they were calling it tighter than they did in the big 12...that helped as well. I'd take him in a heartbeat, just sayin.
wasn't he 19/20 from the FT line? that means they were calling it tighter than they did in the big 12...that helped as well. I'd take him in a heartbeat, just sayin.
WVU most certainly lost because of a bad matchup.
He's actually right. Tech was not one of the top 68 teams this year. OSU went on a long losing streak last year. We are not a 7 tram conference league.
The worst part of the tournament is these 4 play in games. Teams like Wichita state playing 3 games in 5 days is b.s. no reason Wichita state should be at a disadvantage when they play Miami.
Kenpom has Tech as the #52 team in the country. Of course, that's after they lost so they were higher when the field was selected. Tech is #33 in the season ending RPI. According to BPI, they're #46.
So there are 3 unbiased analytical tools that state that Tech is, indisputably, one of the 68 best teams in the country. You have some evidence saying that they're not?
How so? OU basketball in the 80's didn't often lose to lesser talented teams that ran the same press/run and gun style. OU never lost to Loyola Marymount, right?
I think what you are trying to say is that WVU needs a certain kind of matchup to be successful. And that is the definition of being overrated. WVU should have loved going up against a team that pressed/pressured, and ran. A truly bad matchup for them would have been a team that could break their press, but that also wanted to take the air out of the ball, and could match their athleticism inside. Or a team with multiple scoring options, since when you pressure like WVU does, it's often hard to focus your D on any single offensive player (though they did do that to Buddy in the 3rd game). But that wasn't SFA. Most of their offense came from one guy.
No. WVU is modestly talented. They win with thug ball/ref foul-fatigue. Not skill.
Even teetering the comparison to 80s OU vs their opposition is ridiculous.
at one point they lost 7 out of 8 games. No tournament team should have that on their resume. So only 19 wins and the losing streak on their resume is all I need to know they didn't deserve to get in.
If we win tomorrow the Big 12 will get 3 teams in the Sweet 16.
So, despite the fact that all the objective resources say that they're 1 of the best 68, they don't belong because they happened to bunch their losses together rather than spread them out like more deserving teams. Got it.
I suppose it's also to their disadvantage that they bunched their best wins together -- by beating Iowa St, Baylor, and OU consecutively. Losses bunched together = bad. Good wins bunched together = also bad.
I'll take arbitrary decision making for $2000, Alex.
:facepalm
They also finished the season losing to tcu.
So 3 good wins trumps losing 7 out of 8 games during the year, finishing the regular season losing 3 out of 4 games and one of those games was to tcu and you think they were top 68?
So with the loss to butler that means they have loss 4 out of their last 5.
They got in because the bubble was terrible this year.
They weren't even close to the bubble.