WTSooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
- Messages
- 11,801
- Reaction score
- 842
I was hoping we'd be a little better than that, but we're still ahead of some teams we're fighting on the bubble against.
Going to be tight.
People really questioned that? I thought Gibson made the obvious decision apart from the falling over and losing the ball part.
I wanted him to stop and pop for a midrange jumper, I think he would have been ran over and fouled at the least.
Best bet for getting fouled was getting to the hoop. I could see the argument for a floater, as the extra split second could more easily allow for a tip. The only bad decision would have been to pull up from three while down one (if down two, I retract the statement). Falling over and losing the ball was also a less than ideal decision.
He could’ve pulled up from 10-15 feet and hit the jumper, something he did several times this weekend. No way was he getting a foul call from those refs in that situation. Best bet would’ve been a pull up jumper or pass to an open man for the last shot.
None of it matters now.
If memory serves correctly, the ref's overactive whistle gave Tech the lead about 20 seconds earlier, and a few seconds earlier Groves was sent to the line. Solid decision...bad execution.
love that play by davidson more teams should do that
I'm pretty much in NIT mode now. Maybe we can win a couple games there and get momentum for next year.
We are all obviously influenced by the projections. Probably rightfully so though. These 129 people only benefit from being right, not wrong. And it looks like at closing, only about 25/129 are projecting us in. It doesn’t look good and we are going to have to hope that the majority of people who consider themselves good at this have really missed the mark on how the committee will view our resume. I’d say seems like a long shot and that our SOR will likely be used as the biggest reason we are out— essentially while we played a really hard schedule, we just didn’t win enough of them. While I’ll have an issue if there are certain teams in over us, it will honestly probably be hard to claim we got “screwed” this year. What screwed us was not being able to get a few of those one possession losses to go our way. Fingers crossed, but with ten minutes to post time, I am not feeling confident at all.
Im sure they influence each other too, we should be in but if not play cupcakes in non con play
We are all obviously influenced by the projections. Probably rightfully so though. These 129 people only benefit from being right, not wrong. And it looks like at closing, only about 25/129 are projecting us in. It doesn’t look good and we are going to have to hope that the majority of people who consider themselves good at this have really missed the mark on how the committee will view our resume. I’d say seems like a long shot and that our SOR will likely be used as the biggest reason we are out— essentially while we played a really hard schedule, we just didn’t win enough of them. While I’ll have an issue if there are certain teams in over us, it will honestly probably be hard to claim we got “screwed” this year. What screwed us was not being able to get a few of those one possession losses to go our way. Fingers crossed, but with ten minutes to post time, I am not feeling confident at all.
Im sure they influence each other too, we should be in but if not play cupcakes in non con play