Coale "fires" DeCosta and Thraikill

There are some post that I simply cannot directly acknowledge considering the asinine statements and queries. I could care less who anyone on this forum is outside of someone interested in discussing OU WBB....from the coaches, players, admins...anyone involved. Maybe there should be a "Sugar Coated Candy Coale" site if others are only interested in supporting a Coale brand in a positive light. I don't think it's a secret that I am a huge fan of WBB players from CA as I have lived most of my adult years here and followed it. So surprise, surprise! I'm a Paris twin fan...along with so many others. But the topic for this forum is OU WBB, right? I just call it like I see it.

This avoids my requests for understanding. If it is only a matter of supporting California BB players, do you post on all boards that have California players?

Usually, if I don't like a topic, I simply don't bother with a site that deals with that topic. I rarely look at boards other than OU, although I have been invited to join other boards. I might visit a board to see what information they have on a subject, usually from recruiting the same player. But, since I don't really share their concern, I don't go there very often.

I'm just trying to understand why you post here? I don't really care. It is just a curiosity.
 
It should not matter what is or is not required. The question should be why OU can not win a Big 12 championship any longer. Is it because Coale can not recruit the players needed to compete or is she inept as a coach? That is the 2 possibilities I see. I see her being complacent in recruiting and also resting on her laurels for things she did in the last decade.

I agree, it's a bit of both most likely. We get about one very exciting prospect every other year. Then they come here and don't develop more than expected. Probably both the individual and coach's fault.

I hope with the new coaches coming in, this changes. I hope we get back to the top of the Big 12, and the national spotlight. I want us to succeed, I just get frustrated when I see the same mistakes every game and no visible adjustments are made from game 1 to game 30. I don't claim to know everything about BB. Nobody on here does, but my conclusion is it's the coaching.

Fingers crossed visible changes for next season and we get back on track!!
 
Sounds like you paid for your kids to get into college at OU.

No one cares you have "friends" at OU. No one care who you work for.
No one cares that youre a pillow fluffer for yourself.

You arent that important. I assure you. People like Syb a lot more than you.

Its actually really sad you counted how many "friends" parents you and your kid have.

Lol how nice of you to show up on the women’s board for once...
 
There are some post that I simply cannot directly acknowledge considering the asinine statements and queries. I could care less who anyone on this forum is outside of someone interested in discussing OU WBB....from the coaches, players, admins...anyone involved. Maybe there should be a "Sugar Coated Candy Coale" site if others are only interested in supporting a Coale brand in a positive light. I don't think it's a secret that I am a huge fan of WBB players from CA as I have lived most of my adult years here and followed it. So surprise, surprise! I'm a Paris twin fan...along with so many others. But the topic for this forum is OU WBB, right? I just call it like I see it.

I am also a huge Paris Twins fan. Courtney was not only (in my opinion) the best player to ever play in the Big-12, but also a wonderful person. We were incredibly fortunate to have her at OU those 4 years. Ashley showed us all how important conditioning and skill development are. That summer she spent in California with a "coach" improved her play more than all the previous years at OU had. It was obvious and amazing.

I have gotten frustrated at our play this year and also in recent years. But we have several good players and at least one exceptional player.

Ana is considered by recruiters as one of the 5 best players out of an Oklahoma High School over the past 20 years. Remember, she is only a sophomore, but was - no matter what the end of season all star teams showed - one of the best 3 or 4 players in the conference this past season. It was amazing that she was able to dominate so many games after missing the entire pre-conference games due to injury. Very few players could have done that. I loved how hard she played and how much effort she gave on the court.
 
Yes, Syb, 10 years ago she was. A decade ago no one would have even thought of calling for her firing. Even 5 years ago. But when you look at the record and level of play, the warning signs have been there.

2012-13: 21-12
2013-14: 18-15
2014-15: 21-12
2015-16: 22-11
2016-17: 23-10
2017-18: 16-15
2018-19: 8-22 (4-14 in the conference - the most disturbing numbers)

Results matter in college sports. Sherri is getting paid a whopping sum for winning basketball games, conference championships, going to the dance and getting to the top of NCAAWBB heap.

Look at her teams' records above. Most are good, but not close to great. We have definitely entered uncharted territory now -- which is really bad.


I know this one thing better than I know anything about basketball. OU's new cost-conscious, firing-minded president and the GOP controlled, ultra-right wing board of regents are definitely not to continue to pay $1.2 million + to a women's basketball coach who wins only 8 games a season for more than another year.

Bank on it. Sorry for the length.

Is any of this verified?


Look at OU's record against OU's top WBB rival Baylor and Kim for the period 2000-2019. Sherri trails only 20-23. Much more than acceptable. However when you look at the record in more depth Sherri's record against Kim 2000-2010 was 19-6 and Sherri won 10 regular season and conference championships while going to 3 Final Fours plus a Sweet 16. Since our Final Four in 2010 (2011-2019) our record against Baylor is 1-17 and we have won zero conference championships and had only 2 Sweet 16 appearances. By 5 year increments the records are 9-2, 8-4, 2-8 and 1-9. I see a trend and a red flag there.
 
Last edited:
Look at OU's record against OU's top WBB rival Baylor and Kim for the period 2000-2019. Sherri trails only 20-23. Much more than acceptable. However when you look at the record in more depth Sherri's record against Kim 2000-2010 was 19-6 and Sherri won 10 regular season and conference championships while going to 3 Final Fours plus a Sweet 16. Since our Final Four in 2010 (2011-2019) our record against Baylor is 1-17 and we have won zero conference championships and had only 2 Sweet 16 appearances. By 5 year increments the records are 9-2, 8-4, 2-8 and 1-9. I see a trend and a red flag there.

Thanks for the numbers, to see it like that in writing really makes me concerned as well, not that I wasn't already, but this illustrates the steep decline. I will say once again, I hope the addition of two new coaches and maybe one or two spring commitments will make a difference for next season! Fingers crossed!

I will say if SC brought in anywhere close to the same amount of amazing players on a consistent basis like BU & Texas you would see a lot more championships from us. When she has had similar caliber players she has had success. It all comes down to recruiting. Maybe changing your 'system' in order to get these players here again.
 
Last edited:
Look at OU's record against OU's top WBB rival Baylor and Kim for the period 2000-2019. Sherri trails only 20-23. Much more than acceptable. However when you look at the record in more depth Sherri's record against Kim 2000-2010 was 19-6 and Sherri won 10 regular season and conference championships while going to 3 Final Fours plus a Sweet 16. Since our Final Four in 2010 (2011-2019) our record against Baylor is 1-17 and we have won zero conference championships and had only 2 Sweet 16 appearances. By 5 year increments the records are 9-2, 8-4, 2-8 and 1-9. I see a trend and a red flag there.

Exactly. Data/receipts don't lie. And when I've stated that I saw this day coming, it's not because I have a genie in a bottle. It's based on what I've been told about any number of factors that will affect productivity and the overall success of the team. The 2002 FF appearance was a different era and style of play. OU had just what they needed that season to meet that style of play and get to the FF, along with a great NCAA bracket. They matched up very well until of course UCONN. They could have done the same in 2006, but SC chose to go with senior players versus the best match-ups. AND based on the bracket and match-ups, it was a great chance to win the NC.

SC didn't even believe the Paris twins were going to OU. They knew that Cal was a 15 minute drive from their home and where they usually went to camps and to see college games. Cal lost their opportunity when the new AD did not extend the current coach's contract. They also knew the twins and EArriaran wanted to play together. Smart recruits look at rosters and potential incoming recruits to help make the decision as to where to attend. They realize that it is about relationships and chemistry; ultimately how they are going to perform on the court. They want like minded, winner mentality type teammates and believe that other winners will follow. It's not rocket science. The coaches that are consistently in the top 25 reload each year; some better than others. But they reload and maintain winning seasons. SC is the only one I've seen that does not want them. How is it that BGrinner never had an official visit to OU and she named CParis as her favorite college player? A coach with an ounce of recruiting ability should have at least gotten her to the campus and offered. And for all of the BGriner haters...if she had been blowing out baylor while in an OU uniform, everyone would have been jumping for joy and talking about her sexuality choices have nothing to do with her as a person and student-athlete. Even the holiest of rollers would have been cheering and praying that she'd see the light and change her ways off the court. Just real talk! But again...how did OU not recruit her and expect to compete. Mulkey loves that she's kicking OU's butt because she remembers those years when her teams were getting whooped on by OU. That seems like 100 years ago...it's been so long.

And it's about experience in big game situations. That's exactly how the 2010 FF occurred. It's been said/rumored (and I say that because I didn't hear it directly...however the person that told me knew first hand) that SC didn't believe the 2010 team would have a winning season, but they were determined to prove her wrong. And they were good enough to do it because of experience, chemistry and they had enough skill to go with their determination.

Bottom line...and for whatever reason...top recruits who wanted to attend OU were not welcomed or offered. Some were not even recruited and others were recruited but SC declined. You need skilled players that have a determination to work hard and win to be able to get deep into the tournament each year. You have to constantly reload and strategically plan to always have experience players and some leaders. They also need development and great coaching, something that has been absent at OU. Coaches also need big game experience and need to know how to adjust in game time situations. There is no reason why they should not have won the 2009 game against Louisville. SC was simply out coached. Walz adjusted. He had a five minute strategy, a two minute strategy and a final shot clock strategy.

I could care less about someone's opinion that "I hate SC". I don't KNOW her. Furthermore, hate is a strong word. Yes, I hate it that a team I've supported does not have great leadership. But hating people is not a part of me. And I've said in the past that she had some great attributes; community service, fundraising and other stuff like the writing in journals. X's and O's...not so much. And junior...Lord help him! And for the 100th time, the nepotism is just wrong.

When the've gotten some decent recruits in these later years, many of them leave. Did we forget that CWalker fiasco? She left before she got there. There's just too much happening with recruits. And it ultimately affects productivity.
 
Last edited:
Lol how nice of you to show up on the women’s board for once...

I read everything...

I chime in every now and then....

Obviously, I don't follow it as close but I try to stay afloat.
 
One possible name to look out for is Lacey Goldwire. She is an assistant for Mike Neighbors at Arkansas. She also recruited Megan Gustafson at Iowa when she was there. Lacey is an Oklahoma native that played at East Central in Ada and was a grad assistant at OSU.
 
She looks like she would be a good candidate and fresh face, but, again, you want to come to a program for a year to three years max under troubled circumstances? Joe C. cannot guarantee an assistant coach a job if he decides Sherri has to go.

I just don't know what to think about the possibility we have of getting quality assistant head coaches when everything is so tenuous. I'd like to think we still have a significant enough profile as a program that we could be a draw.

All we can do is wait and see and hope for the best. These assistants will be the toughest decision Sherri and Joe have had to make for this program in 20 years.

This, time, thought, Joe reportedly has the final say, which we can all hope will be a major step forward. His judgement for OU has been tremendous.
 
Last edited:
She looks like she would be a good candidate and fresh face, but, again, you want to come to a program for a year to three years max under troubled circumstances? Joe C. cannot guarantee an assistant coach a job if he decides Sherri has to go.

I just don't know what to think about the possibility we have of getting quality assistant head coaches when everything is so tenuous. I'd like to think we still have a significant enough profile as a program that we could be a draw.

All we can do is wait and see and hope for the best. These assistants will be the toughest decision Sherri and Joe have had to make for this program in 20 years.

This, time, thought, Joe reportedly has the final say, which we can all hope will be a major step forward. His judgement for OU has been tremendous.

liver,

Why do you always seem to think only a man is smart enough to make decisions? And since you always post as if that is your way of seeing the world, why do you even watch women's basketball?

And if you think about it, what is it that makes you think JC is so great? He does love money. And due to that, he often makes decisions that are not what is best for the fans or attendance, or even the programs. But if you think he is the one deciding who the assistant coaches are, then he is the one pushing nepotism. Do you understand that?
 
I'm not looking for an argument.

All I said was that based on information available to some of us from another board, that Joe C. now (as in the last few weeks) has to sign off on all hiring decisions (that's new) and that could be a good thing. We've gotten a sample of what gets turned out with Sherri making all the decisions. She hires her son and only wins 8 games.

So, it seems like some kind of significant change is in order. Under pressure, allegedly, she fired Pam and Chad. The information many of us have been given is that Joe now has to approve all hires whereas before he didn't (hello junior)!

I think it might be better, at this time, to have an additional set of proven eyes review and approve any new hiring. Joe has proven he can thread the needle and do a great job on several occasions. He hasn't missed in my opinion since becoming A.D.

It's just that simple.

And for the record: All but one of my bosses professionally have been women. Ive been married 50 years and I have daughters and granddaughters. Most of my best friends are women. And I actually prefer working with women.

Oh, and my grandmother and mother raised me by themselves.

ME???? Trouble with women being in the boss or the authority? Hardly.

And, FTR, I have been a big supporter of Sherri and the program until she started losing like John Blake.

As usual, you barely know what you're talking about.
 
Last edited:
liver,

Why do you always seem to think only a man is smart enough to make decisions? And since you always post as if that is your way of seeing the world, why do you even watch women's basketball?

And if you think about it, what is it that makes you think JC is so great? He does love money. And due to that, he often makes decisions that are not what is best for the fans or attendance, or even the programs. But if you think he is the one deciding who the assistant coaches are, then he is the one pushing nepotism. Do you understand that?

So if OH thinks Joe reportedly has the final say, which we can all hope will be a major step forward and his judgement for OU has been tremendous it is a gender issue? OH never mentioned gender. OH never said anyone was smarter than anyone else. You are the one who brought gender into the discussion when you stated: Why do you always seem to think only a man is smart enough to make decisions? OH instead said: These assistants will be the toughest decision Sherri and Joe have had to make for this program in 20 years. Note OH did mentioned Sherri first with regard to the assistants hiring decision.

No question Joe C. has supported nepotism multiple times in at least 5 sports football, MBB, WBB, Softball and WGYM that I know of and while not against the law is a bad business practice. Especially at a public university.
 
So if OH thinks Joe reportedly has the final say, which we can all hope will be a major step forward and his judgement for OU has been tremendous it is a gender issue? OH never mentioned gender. OH never said anyone was smarter than anyone else. You are the one who brought gender into the discussion when you stated: Why do you always seem to think only a man is smart enough to make decisions? OH instead said: These assistants will be the toughest decision Sherri and Joe have had to make for this program in 20 years. Note OH did mentioned Sherri first with regard to the assistants hiring decision.

No question Joe C. has supported nepotism multiple times in at least 5 sports football, MBB, WBB, Softball and WGYM that I know of and while not against the law is a bad business practice. Especially at a public university.


Have any of the hiring of family members been such as the one with SC and CC? What I mean by that is the only job it appears CC has had in his life is with his mother. I really don't have too big of a problem with family members on the same coaching staff IF (big IF) they have each earned their experience separate and apart from one another, before working in a major college or pro team.
 
I'm not looking for an argument.

All I said was that based on information available to some of us from another board, that Joe C. now (as in the last few weeks) has to sign off on all hiring decisions (that's new) and that could be a good thing. We've gotten a sample of what gets turned out with Sherri making all the decisions. She hires her son and only wins 8 games.

So, it seems like some kind of significant change is in order. Under pressure, allegedly, she fired Pam and Chad. The information many of us have been given is that Joe now has to approve all hires whereas before he didn't (hello junior)!

I think it might be better, at this time, to have an additional set of proven eyes review and approve any new hiring. Joe has proven he can thread the needle and do a great job on several occasions. He hasn't missed in my opinion since becoming A.D.

It's just that simple.

And for the record: All but one of my bosses professionally have been women. Ive been married 50 years and I have daughters and granddaughters. Most of my best friends are women. And I actually prefer working with women.

Oh, and my grandmother and mother raised me by themselves.

ME???? Trouble with women being in the boss or the authority? Hardly.

And, FTR, I have been a big supporter of Sherri and the program until she started losing like John Blake.

As usual, you barely know what you're talking about.

The name Capel ring a bell? ;)

Agree w/ the rest though, JC’s record has been none too shabby at all.
 
Capel was OK for a bit, but I had forgotten about him. Wait, wasn't he before Joe and in the Duncan era? I truly can't remember and I'm too lazy today to go check. I haven't liked men's basketball since I was at the scorer's bench keeping stats for Tubbs and his boys.

That was a big hoot every game, let me tell ya!
 
Isn't Patti's son on her coaching staff. Maybe there. All others that I am aware of the siblings or whatever had significant coaching experience -- such as the Stoops.

Some would argue Switzer and John Blake...LOL
 
You can add Pete Hughes baseball, Santiago Restrepo volleyball and Mark Cody wrestling to the Jeff Capel list. Could be unaware of a couple more.
 
Back
Top