Max Power
New member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 5,672
- Reaction score
- 0
So am I the only person here that likes the portal?
I don't hate it. I'm all for people having freedom of choice and movement. These players aren't property.
So am I the only person here that likes the portal?
So am I the only person here that likes the portal?
I don't hate it. I'm all for people having freedom of choice and movement. These players aren't property.
I don't hate it. I'm all for people having freedom of choice and movement. These players aren't property.
But what if a guy wants to transfer mid season? In the real world you can do that. I can leave my job today and work for a competitor tomorrow if I wanted to. Could a guy play for OU Tuesday, KU Saturday, and then OSU in the B12 tournament? In all seriousness, if the argument is that players aren’t property and shouldn’t have their movements restricted, then why not allow that?
What about a player in his senior year and his team winds up stinking? Should he be able to transfer to a good team at the end of the year to help them for the stretch run? I’m asking seriously.
And if your answer to that is no, then I don’t fully understand your initial argument.
But what if a guy wants to transfer mid season? In the real world you can do that. I can leave my job today and work for a competitor tomorrow if I wanted to. Could a guy play for OU Tuesday, KU Saturday, and then OSU in the B12 tournament? In all seriousness, if the argument is that players aren’t property and shouldn’t have their movements restricted, then why not allow that?
What about a player in his senior year and his team winds up stinking? Should he be able to transfer to a good team at the end of the year to help them for the stretch run? I’m asking seriously.
And if your answer to that is no, then I don’t fully understand your initial argument.
you have to draw the line somewhere.
If your argument is they aren't property so they should be able to transfer, then you have to allow them to transfer at any time with no restrictions.
you have to draw the line somewhere.
If your argument is they aren't property so they should be able to transfer, then you have to allow them to transfer at any time with no restrictions.
"A slippery slope fallacy occurs when someone makes a claim about a series of events that would lead to one major event, usually a bad event. In this fallacy, a person makes a claim that one event leads to another event and so on until we come to some awful conclusion. Along the way, each step or event in the faulty logic becomes more and more improbable."
But what if a guy wants to transfer mid season? In the real world you can do that. I can leave my job today and work for a competitor tomorrow if I wanted to. Could a guy play for OU Tuesday, KU Saturday, and then OSU in the B12 tournament? In all seriousness, if the argument is that players aren’t property and shouldn’t have their movements restricted, then why not allow that?
What about a player in his senior year and his team winds up stinking? Should he be able to transfer to a good team at the end of the year to help them for the stretch run? I’m asking seriously.
And if your answer to that is no, then I don’t fully understand your initial argument.
So am I the only person here that likes the portal?
It's a love/hate relationship
How many of you would take a stand on moral grounds if Breece Hall from Iowa State decider to transfer to OU? Intraconference, transferring to a blue blood ... I’m guessing 95 percent of OU fans would be thrilled to see him lining up in our backfield on the first play of the season. If you hate transfers and think kids should sit out a year, that’s fine, but people should at least apply the same standards regardless of whether it is a transfer that helps or hurts OU, and regardless of whether you hate the other team involved, as appears to be the case with Harmon being linked to KU.
LOL OU is having to re recruit against a bevy of heavyweights for a guy currently on their roster. Bizarro world.
Now, if they transferred at mid-season, that would be doable from the perspective of transferring to the school. But that could be easily avoided by adjusting the scholarship to say if you don't complete the season you have to pay the scholarship money back or something. It wouldn't be a big deal.
This is a pretty good example of the Slippery Slope Fallacy.
They should just let him walk. I wouldn’t participate in any sort of re-recruitment here. Moser introducing himself and laying out his vision is perfectly fine, but no chance would I engage in some sort of campaign to convince him to stay. That’s ridiculous.