Didn't realize how atheletic KSU and Baylor were.

SoonersRule

Banned
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
279
Reaction score
0
Till, We got into the tournament. Don't get me wrong, I think they are very good teams. I just didn't think they had the talent comparable to Kentucky, Kansas, and Syracuse.
 
Till, We got into the tournament. Don't get me wrong, I think they are very good teams. I just didn't think they had the talent comparable to Kentucky, Kansas, and Syracuse.
Neither have the talent comparable to Kentucky. Kentucky has two of the top 5 picks, three of the top 10, and 4 of the top 12. That's why they will win the tournament, as whoever is the most talented almost always does.
 
Neither have the talent comparable to Kentucky. Kentucky has two of the top 5 picks, three of the top 10, and 4 of the top 12. That's why they will win the tournament, as whoever is the most talented almost always does.

Sucks that WVU lost their PG because I think they had a real chance to beat UK.
 
Don't count out the advantage West Virginia will have playing in Syracuse.

Kentucky should win but West Virginia is every bit as tough as Tennessee who beat Kansas and Kentucky.

BTW - Syracuse felt the bracket pain OU had in 2002 when we had the play them in Boston as the #1 seed. Now they had to travel to Salt Lake because of the fluke situation of the Carrier Dome hosting the regional.
 
Don't count out the advantage West Virginia will have playing in Syracuse.

Kentucky should win but West Virginia is every bit as tough as Tennessee who beat Kansas and Kentucky.

BTW - Syracuse felt the bracket pain OU had in 2002 when we had the play them in Boston as the #1 seed. Now they had to travel to Salt Lake because of the fluke situation of the Carrier Dome hosting the regional.

Wasn't that Albany?
 
Sucks that WVU lost their PG because I think they had a real chance to beat UK.
Yea they have been turning the ball over without him. Do that against Kentucky, and they are dunking all night.
 
Neither have the talent comparable to Kentucky. Kentucky has two of the top 5 picks, three of the top 10, and 4 of the top 12. That's why they will win the tournament, as whoever is the most talented almost always does.

Daniel Orton is also grabbing scouts' attention. Could be a 1st round pick if he comes out this year.
 
Till, We got into the tournament. Don't get me wrong, I think they are very good teams. I just didn't think they had the talent comparable to Kentucky, Kansas, and Syracuse.

One rule to live by is that it's easier to turn a good athlete into a basketball player than a basketball player into a good athlete. Kentucky, Kansas, UNC usually have guys who are both when they come in. Other schools have either or. Baylor has a good balance of talented basketball guys on the perimeter in Carter and Dunn and then super athletes like Udoh and Acy.
 
Back
Top