WichitaSooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2015
- Messages
- 11,697
- Reaction score
- 8,715
No one is arguing it would be "for cause" legally. And I have no idea how it sends the wrong message to the players (they aren't kids, they are all adults, BTW) that job performance matters. Players, for all intents and purposes, lose their "job" midseason all the time -- guys get benched for poor performance, or have minutes cut back significantly. Conversely, guys who play well can get "promoted" to a bigger role.JMO, but firing Moser during the season is just wrong. Winning or losing doesn't constitute "cause" for firing anyone. Teaches the wrong lesson to kids, both for those on campus and those that might be in the program in the future. It is just plain irresponsible.
Let the kids and coaches fight to the end, finish the season completely, then if you want to make a change, do it. The fact that most other schools and administrators do the wrong thing, doesn't make OU doing it right.
I don't think allowing Moser to finish the season prevents you from being honest with Moser about his future. You should be. You can start evaluating coaching candidates now and even having preliminary talks with agents. Then when the season is over, and if Moser is not going to be retained, then you can move quickly to get another coach. Point being, I don't think you are hurting yourself by handling this situation properly. If another coach is willing to betray his current program and/or not wait for an opening at OU, then who wants him anyway.
And, I know, I am an old foggy.
It's real life. People get fired all the time for being bad at their job. Especially when they have been consistently bad for five years. Companies don't keep a guy around for an extra few weeks to get to the next marker on the calendar. I know sports are unique because there are defined seasons, but when a coach has been so bad for so long, there is nothing wrong with not letting a lame duck finish out a season.

