thebigabd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 13,496
- Reaction score
- 77
In this context, when I say delusions of grandeur, I mean the apparrent obsession with a lot of fans and a lot of teams about whether or not their guys can play in the NBA.
Every recruit seems to be judged by whether or not they can play in the NBA, and then when someone shows up on campus they are seemingly evaluated against NBA players. Can they play in the NBA? Can the develop into an NBA player? What is missing from them playing in the NBA?
In my opinion, this is not only bad for NCAA basketball but also unfair to the players. Let's be clear on something... Since 1995, OU has sent the following players to the NBA:
I believe that's it... in 22 years. And while Najera and Hield were amazing for the program, they will both be role players in the NBA. Even the best of our All-American studs outside of Blake Griffin were role guys in the NBA.
It's bad for the sport because it implies a quality difference between NCAA and NBA basketball. That is inherent, the NBA is a professional league and NCAA is an amateur/collegiate sport. It's more important in NCAA basketball to beat your rival, show school spirit, make the NCAA Tournament, etc than it is to win a National Championship or send guys to the NBA. Look at what happened in Stillwater the other night. THAT is what college basketball is all about. Heated rivals, competitive game, crazy atmosphere, playing for your school, etc.
It's bad for the players because it's flat out not fair to them to be measured against NBA players, and fans are then put in a position to say "no they aren't GOOD ENOUGH to do that"... Well, guess what, practically none of them are. They were brought to their school to receive an education and represent their school and their fans in the college game. It's not a developmental ground for potential NBA players. We really shouldn't give a hoot if player X or Y can play in the NBA. We should only care if they can play at this level.
This is also a problem for NCAA Football, but, I don't have time to get into that this morning.
Every recruit seems to be judged by whether or not they can play in the NBA, and then when someone shows up on campus they are seemingly evaluated against NBA players. Can they play in the NBA? Can the develop into an NBA player? What is missing from them playing in the NBA?
In my opinion, this is not only bad for NCAA basketball but also unfair to the players. Let's be clear on something... Since 1995, OU has sent the following players to the NBA:
- Blake Griffin
- Buddy Hield
- Eduardo Najera
I believe that's it... in 22 years. And while Najera and Hield were amazing for the program, they will both be role players in the NBA. Even the best of our All-American studs outside of Blake Griffin were role guys in the NBA.
It's bad for the sport because it implies a quality difference between NCAA and NBA basketball. That is inherent, the NBA is a professional league and NCAA is an amateur/collegiate sport. It's more important in NCAA basketball to beat your rival, show school spirit, make the NCAA Tournament, etc than it is to win a National Championship or send guys to the NBA. Look at what happened in Stillwater the other night. THAT is what college basketball is all about. Heated rivals, competitive game, crazy atmosphere, playing for your school, etc.
It's bad for the players because it's flat out not fair to them to be measured against NBA players, and fans are then put in a position to say "no they aren't GOOD ENOUGH to do that"... Well, guess what, practically none of them are. They were brought to their school to receive an education and represent their school and their fans in the college game. It's not a developmental ground for potential NBA players. We really shouldn't give a hoot if player X or Y can play in the NBA. We should only care if they can play at this level.
This is also a problem for NCAA Football, but, I don't have time to get into that this morning.