saw that, but didnt' think the timing was the best, considering these are only his 1st and 2nd postseason wins EVER while at OU (including the Big 12 tourney)
Wrong. We won a game in the Big 12 tourney this year.
And throwing in the Big 12 tourney doesn't apply, anyway; that wasn't what the OP was talking about.
saw that, but didnt' think the timing was the best, considering these are only his 1st and 2nd postseason wins EVER while at OU (including the Big 12 tourney)
saw that, but didnt' think the timing was the best, considering these are only his 1st and 2nd postseason wins EVER while at OU (including the Big 12 tourney)
Interesting factoid. I can't believe Ford doesn't have 2 NCAA tourney wins in 15 years. Wow.
Is he under any heat? I know he has a sweetheart contract that makes it difficult to get rid of him.
Got this from another board which I will not credit at this time.
Lon Kruger has more NCAA wins this year than Travis Ford has in 15 years of coaching
I don't buy that crap for one minute. It's bad business to keep a bad coach just because you don't want to pay a buyout. An empty arena and no excitement around the program costs a lot more than that.
If Holder and TBP truly believed that Travis Ford isn't the guy, he'd be gone. So I'm not allowing them that excuse. The unfavorable contract is a red herring, IMO.
The bigger story, IMO, is whether oSu is really a basketball school that can attract (and keep) a quality coach. Here are their post-Iba stabs at it.
Aubrey 1970-73: 18-60
Strong 1973-77: 35-70
Kiilingsworth 1977-79: 22-31
Hansen 1979-86: 107-89 / One NCAA appearance
Hamilton 1986-1990: 56-63
E Sutton 1990-2006: 386-151 / 13 NCAA appearances / 2 Final 4s / 1 Elite 8 / 3 Sweet 16s
S Sutton 2006-2008: 39-29
Ford 2008-2015: 52-50 / 5 NCAA appearances
They only got Eddie Sutton because nobody else would touch him with a ten-foot pole with all the Kentucky monkey business. It's just like Bob Knight at Tech. Neither Sutton nor Knight were going to ever get another elite HC job, so that opened up oSu and Tech to a quality of coach that wouldn't normally be available to programs of their caliber. Nobody else oSu has hired had anything remotely similar to Sutton's success. To be honest, Ford has done far better than the others. So the question is, if they fire him, is there any chance they stumble onto the next Eddie Sutton?
Truth is, if they did hire a guy who had that kind of success, he'd probably end up leaving for one of the true blue-blood programs anyway. Sutton didn't have that option, and at his age, probably was happy to finish up in Stillwater.
So maybe TBP and Holder are looking at it like that. Hire a new guy, three things can happen. 1 - He sucks; 2 - He's marginally successful, just like Ford; 3 - He's very successful, leaves for a better job, and embarrasses a program with an over-inflated sense of self-worth.
Maybe letting Ford grow into a better coach is their answer. Because if they thought they could do better, he'd already be gone.
Here are their post-Iba stabs at it.
I don't buy that crap for one minute. It's bad business to keep a bad coach just because you don't want to pay a buyout. An empty arena and no excitement around the program costs a lot more than that.
If Holder and TBP truly believed that Travis Ford isn't the guy, he'd be gone. So I'm not allowing them that excuse. The unfavorable contract is a red herring, IMO.
The bigger story, IMO, is whether oSu is really a basketball school that can attract (and keep) a quality coach. Here are their post-Iba stabs at it.
Aubrey 1970-73: 18-60
Strong 1973-77: 35-70
Kiilingsworth 1977-79: 22-31
Hansen 1979-86: 107-89 / One NCAA appearance
Hamilton 1986-1990: 56-63
E Sutton 1990-2006: 386-151 / 13 NCAA appearances / 2 Final 4s / 1 Elite 8 / 3 Sweet 16s
S Sutton 2006-2008: 39-29
Ford 2008-2015: 52-50 / 5 NCAA appearances
They only got Eddie Sutton because nobody else would touch him with a ten-foot pole with all the Kentucky monkey business. It's just like Bob Knight at Tech. Neither Sutton nor Knight were going to ever get another elite HC job, so that opened up oSu and Tech to a quality of coach that wouldn't normally be available to programs of their caliber. Nobody else oSu has hired had anything remotely similar to Sutton's success. To be honest, Ford has done far better than the others. So the question is, if they fire him, is there any chance they stumble onto the next Eddie Sutton?
Truth is, if they did hire a guy who had that kind of success, he'd probably end up leaving for one of the true blue-blood programs anyway. Sutton didn't have that option, and at his age, probably was happy to finish up in Stillwater.
So maybe TBP and Holder are looking at it like that. Hire a new guy, three things can happen. 1 - He sucks; 2 - He's marginally successful, just like Ford; 3 - He's very successful, leaves for a better job, and embarrasses a program with an over-inflated sense of self-worth.
Maybe letting Ford grow into a better coach is their answer. Because if they thought they could do better, he'd already be gone.
http://www.orangepower.com/threads/ou-to-the-sweet-16.202223/
Awesome butt hurt in this thread.
Sent from my KFTHWI using Tapatalk
It's ancient history, but their pre-Iba stabs at it aren't any better. They've had two good coaches in their entire history, three if you count Ford.