keysersose
New member
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Messages
- 80
- Reaction score
- 0
I find myself wondering if the only consistent characteristic of the OU women's program over the last 19 years has been its inconsistency. Whether we look at the difference between the first and second halves of the Stanford game, or the losing and winning runs this season, or the win every other game of the two previous seasons, or the good runs and the not so good runs in the NCAA tournament, we see that the program most often shows promise that it soon disappoints.
If this is correct, then I find myself wondering why it has so consistently been the case, and what reason there is to suppose that a program that has been consistently inconsistent will become a program that consistently wins.
Any thoughts?
If this is correct, then I find myself wondering why it has so consistently been the case, and what reason there is to suppose that a program that has been consistently inconsistent will become a program that consistently wins.
Any thoughts?