thats not entirely accurate. I believe Kim actually touched the ref. That is an absolute ejectable infraction. It was in the heat of emotion for her and that constitutes violating the intent of the rule about touching the refs as well as the language of the rule which should have required her ejection.
I do believe Kim was right about the refs not calling that blatant and obvious foul. And she was right in protesting. However, there was absolutely no reason for her to react as ridiculously as she did because it would have had zero impact on the game. LSU had already lost. And by reaching out and actually touching the ref, there should have been no question as to her ejection.
Madi, on the other hand, violated the language of the rule, but not the intent. The refs were fully within their authority to eject her but I don't know if they were required to eject her.
Either way, the refs did what they did, different ref crews and different leagues. So, who knows. It doesn't really seem fair to Madi though.