Lakers suck

Would love to see the Wizards beat the Lakers tonight. Anyone ever fired 2 coaches in the first 6 weeks of the season?
 
sperry said:
Would love to see the Wizards beat the Lakers tonight. Anyone ever fired 2 coaches in the first 6 weeks of the season?
Click to expand...
If the Wizards win tonight the mathematics for the playoffs are starting to not add up.

Right now the Lakers have to go 39-20 to get to 48 wins, the average # of wins for the 8 seed in the West over past 4 full seasons. You have to assume a couple wins vs. the Wizards for them to go 39-20.

If the Lakers went 28-0 at home the rest of the year, they would have to 11-20 on the road the rest of the year to reach the 48 win threshold.
 
Last edited:
silly talk. The Lakers are only 2 games in the win column from the 7 seed after this losing stretch.

Does anybody seriously think they won't have 3 or 4 winning stretches double this losing stretch? Pretty funny to hear Thunder fans talking smack. You could easily see the Lakers exploiting the Thunder fatal weakness inside and taking them out in the 1st round.
 
Pretty funny to hear Thunder fans talking smack. You could easily see the Lakers exploiting the Thunder fatal weakness inside and taking them out in the 1st round.
Click to expand...
Let's examine this statement.

Last 10 games between Thunder and Lakers:

Thunder are 8-2, average score 104.3 to 96.

Now, the Thunder's fatal weakness and how LA has dominated them inside:

Points in paint in those 10 games: Lakers 45.0-41.4

Rebounds in those 10 games: Lakers 43.8-41.4


So in summary, yea the Lakers have had a slight advantage in the paint and in rebounding, but obviously it's not been enough to get run by the Thunder over the past 2 plus years. The old men Lakers can't keep up with the young guns in OKC. So, sure, the Lakers can win 4 out of 7 with them after losing 8 of 10, but only a moron could "easily" see it.
 
Thunder have not changed. They are like Dirks old Mavs living & dying by the jump shot. That shooters chance will always fail.

Thunder have never played a single game vs this Lakers team. It's not surprising to see you toss out the "moron" term to make yourself feel smarter. It's like the cowards who claim they need a handgun for self defense. It's 2012. Anybody whose still clinging to their handguns is an insecure paranoid coward.
 
bocabull said:
Thunder have not changed. They are like Dirks old Mavs living & dying by the jump shot. That shooters chance will always fail.

Thunder have never played a single game vs this Lakers team. It's not surprising to see you toss out the "moron" term to make yourself feel smarter. It's like the cowards who claim they need a handgun for self defense. It's 2012. Anybody whose still clinging to their handguns is an insecure paranoid coward.
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ man
 
So bocabull you see the lakers winning two of every three games from here on out?

And eff off on your guns statement. Not the place or time
 
SoonerBounce13 said:
So bocabull you see the lakers winning two of every three games from here on out?

And eff off on your guns statement. Not the place or time
Click to expand...
Only a low life tries to make political statements the day of such an event.

As for the Lakers, I actually think they will rally to make the playoffs. I have a lot of respect for Nash's game, and I think he makes a big enough difference in an increasingly watered down West. I don't think the West is as deep as it has been in years past, which gets them in. Sure, they can make some noise, but I doubt it, they are just so slow, and Artest is no longer a plus defender, people are blowing past him.
 
Last edited:
coolm said:
meh - what he said about guns is true.
Click to expand...

So I'm an insecure coward for owning a gun for self defense? Sorry but my wife and two kids are worth the world to me and if somebody breaks I to my house, I want to have a chance to protect them. Eff off
 
SoonerBounce13 said:
So I'm an insecure coward for owning a gun for self defense? Sorry but my wife and two kids are worth the world to me and if somebody breaks I to my house, I want to have a chance to protect them. Eff off
Click to expand...

"eff" yourself. He said "handguns". Protecting your precious family just becomes a convenient excuse so you can exercise 'embiggened' thoughts of participating in a shootout. Shotgun works fine.
 
coolm said:
"eff" yourself. He said "handguns". Protecting your precious family just becomes a convenient excuse so you can exercise 'embiggened' thoughts of participating in a shootout. Shotgun works fine.
Click to expand...

Lol u are a fool. U are a joke. So shotguns are fine but handguns aren't?
 
yes, shotguns are fine. I have no problem with normal rifles and shotguns. Hunting is good. Protecting ones' home and family is good.

What's NOT good is keeping a weapon designed for military use and using the excuse of "defense of family" as a reason for justifying it. It's disingenuous and dangerous to the rest of us.

YOU insinuated that your family had a special worth to you so I said precious. Get over it and stop calling me names.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/precious
 
coolm said:
yes, shotguns are fine. I have no problem with normal rifles and shotguns. Hunting is good. Protecting ones' home and family is good.

What's NOT good is keeping a weapon designed for military use and using the excuse of "defense of family" as a reason for justifying it. It's disingenuous and dangerous to the rest of us.

YOU insinuated that your family had a special worth to you so I said precious. Get over it and stop calling me names.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/precious
Click to expand...

You have no idea what you are talking about. Lol this is comical. You may know your sports (debatable) but sounds like you are pretty unintelligent.

You realize this guy killed the kids with a rifle too right? Type of gun doesn't matter. If handguns were outlawed then he either woul have found one illegally or used a rifle.

I will never understand ur type of thinking. If I have a handgun for home defense, how is that different from having a shotgun for home defense?
 
if type of gun doesn't matter then it's fine to get rid of the assault rifles and pistols, right?

I thought not.

If you are so surprised about why I have a problem with handguns as a criminal defense attorney then you are the one sounding rather unintelligent. Maybe you should call your Aunt Mom and Uncle Dad and ask them to explain.
 
coolm said:
if type of gun doesn't matter then it's fine to get rid of the assault rifles and pistols, right?

I thought not.

If you are so surprised about why I have a problem with handguns as a criminal defense attorney then you are the one sounding rather unintelligent. Maybe you should call your Aunt Mom and Uncle Dad and ask them to explain.
Click to expand...

Lol you really are a joke
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
OU vs Michigan - Best Game I Ever Saw In Person!
2
Replies
38
Views
873
MsProudSooner
M
BoulderSooner
Which Guys do you Trust??
Replies
19
Views
650
WichitaSooner
W
J
Thoughts on Bama
Replies
17
Views
338
WichitaSooner
W
C
Thoughts on the game
4 5 6
Replies
111
Views
4K
BulldogSooner
B
M
East Texas A&M
Replies
5
Views
280
BossFan64
B
Back
Top