Last four years in Big 12 play

Someone add another year. I’m lazy. Let’s see how long this can go on for.
 
Since the beginning of the 2016-17 season:

1. Kansas: 49-14

2. Baylor: 39-24

3. Texas Tech: 36-27

4. Kansas State: 34-29

5. West Virginia: 33-30

6. Iowa State: 27-36

7. TCU: 26-37

T8. OU: 24-39

T8. Texas: 24-39

10. OSU: 23-40


Just.... ugly. Embarrassing. Pathetic. No two ways about it!
 
of course randomly add 1 more year

and you have
1. KU 64-17
2. Baylor 49-32
3. WVU 46-35
4. Tech 45-36
5. KSU 39-42
6. ISU 37-44
7. OU 36-45
8. Texas 35-46
9. TCU 28-53
10. osu 26-55

I'm sure you meant well, but what you accomplished was showing that adding our best year in a decade moved us up one whole spot to 7th. Woohoo.
 
of course randomly add 1 more year

and you have
1. KU 64-17
2. Baylor 49-32
3. WVU 46-35
4. Tech 45-36
5. KSU 39-42
6. ISU 37-44
7. OU 36-45
8. Texas 35-46
9. TCU 28-53
10. osu 26-55

Not really better.
 
Most things can be labeled 'arbitrary,' but it doesn't erase records from the history books.
 
of course randomly add 1 more year



and you have

1. KU 64-17

2. Baylor 49-32

3. WVU 46-35

4. Tech 45-36

5. KSU 39-42

6. ISU 37-44

7. OU 36-45

8. Texas 35-46

9. TCU 28-53

10. osu 26-55


That would have been a 12-6 year. Sadly, this depresses me more than before.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
of course randomly add 1 more year

and you have
1. KU 64-17
2. Baylor 49-32
3. WVU 46-35
4. Tech 45-36
5. KSU 39-42
6. ISU 37-44
7. OU 36-45
8. Texas 35-46
9. TCU 28-53
10. osu 26-55

Woo!! We passed TCU with this one. Thanks Buddy!
 
We play 31 regular season games then have 1 guaranteed big 12 tournament game. 19 of our guaranteed 32 games we play are against Big 12 teams. That is a 59.375% of our guaranteed games. We go in a run in the conference tournament the percentage only gets higher. That does get offset by and NCAA or NIT games. So around 60% of our season is against the big 12. I think that is significant
 
Did anyone hear Dusty and Mark talking about how Lon Kruger might be on the hot seat if they keep having Big 12 sub .500 records? First time I ever heard the media talk about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Did anyone hear Dusty and Mark talking about how Lon Kruger might be on the hot seat if they keep having Big 12 sub .500 records? First time I ever heard the media talk about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Joe C would be guilty of dereliction of duty if Kruger was not on the hot seat.
Joe needs to stop with the long contract extensions.
 
Joe C would be guilty of dereliction of duty if Kruger was not on the hot seat.
Joe needs to stop with the long contract extensions.

Joe C doesn’t even think about the basketball program. Lon will be here as long as he wants. The only way to get Joe C’s attention would be to embarrass the university by losing every game or getting into NCAA trouble.

Even if we miss the tourney every year, as long as we’re in the conversation on the bubble, Joe C still wouldn’t do anything. He wouldn’t even notice.
 
If texas beats Tech today (they're looking sharp in the first half), we'll be in a three-way tie for fourth place. If Tech rallies to win, we'll be alone in fifth.
 
If texas beats Tech today (they're looking sharp in the first half), we'll be in a three-way tie for fourth place. If Tech rallies to win, we'll be alone in fifth.

You want us to root for Texas? We'll take one for the team and do it.
 
Now sitting at 26-42 the last 3+ years. And in his entire tenure at OU Kruger is two games below .500.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top