For what it's worth, I frequently find myself at odds with articulating my thoughts. The multitude of active applications often diverts my attention. I draft a single sentence and then find myself ensnared in the alluring web of social media – a cycle of Twitter, Discord, and back again – only to lose the thread of my initial intention.
I am unequivocally convinced that the optimal outcome would be for Richmond to join OU. On the theoretical level, the pairing of Richmond and Miles promises to be a distinguished combination.
It was my intention to suggest a strategic incentive for Richmond, contingent upon his decision not to choose OU. Should he consider an institution like St. John's, the prudent course of action would be to shift focus toward securing the most promising Center/Power Forward available, along with another potential candidate for starting guard, whose identity remains to be determined.
In the event that OU succeeds in recruiting Richmond, I maintain the stance that there exist superior alternatives for the Center/Power Forward position than Reeves, potentially with similar financial implications. This is simply my own perspective. I am quite comfortable in adopting a contrarian viewpoint, particularly regarding the discourse surrounding Reeves. It is not uncommon for me to adopt a stance that diverges from the prevailing consensus.
-------
AI off.
I meant to say, "Offer the Kadary bag to...",
if he doesn't choose OU. I'm definitely in favor of adding Richmond. And if they do, I think they can do better than Reeves even if they're looking for A) a backup B) cheaply.