Kewllane
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2011
- Messages
- 359
- Reaction score
- 31
He said Jalon, not Javian.Meh. I don't really want both him and Pedulla. Nothing about JM isn't replaceable. I hate replacing all of our top 5 guards (JM, Uzan, Soares, Oweh, and Darthard), but holding onto JM doesn't do a ton for me personally.
Remember when my biggest complaint about Moser was a general "state of the program", well, this stuff is a big part of it. If Moser can't get kids on campus, keep them for 2-3 years, and DEVELOP them he is worthless to OU as a basketball coach. So far he's shown he can get them here, but not the other two things.
But I do agree, I don't think losing Javian is honestly that big of a deal if you can replace with someone better in the portal.
I don't think Javian has the body to be able to compete in high level college ball.
I think losing Oweh, Uzan, and McCollum are bad from the standpoint that it looks like Moser can't keep ANY continuity year to year. That's troubling, but I think there's a lot of coaches out there with that issue right now. The portal makes this a free for all.
However, when I look at those three specifically in a vacuum, without having continuity on my mind, I'm not sure we really go anywhere with them.
So you have to take your pick, do you want continuity, even if that means losing out on players in the portal that are better talent wise? Or do you want the best talent, but have to re-teach your philosophy to a new group of guys each year?
I tend to lean towards the latter in today's game, but I understand the argument for the former.
Last edited: