Naismith Finalists (no Trae Young)

No one has ever done what Trae did and he doesn’t make the list. Tough to understand.
 
No one has ever done what Trae did and he doesn’t make the list. Tough to understand.

Has anyone made the list playing for a 10 seed that lost 12 games?

I honestly don't know the answer, I'm really asking.
 
ESPN did their best to build him up and over hype him. "Tray Young knocks off TCU"; running his stat line above the score for the entire game.

Then they returned the favor by tearing him down. "He is taking too many shots" etc.

He is a victim of the today mentality. The first to lead the nation in pts and asst = NPOY in my book. It isn't a just a Feb/Mar award. It should be for the entire season.
 
I didn't think he should've won it, but to not be a finalist blows my mind.
 
Has anyone ever been a finalists that wasn’t the Conference POY?
 
I have to say, I'm not surprised at this. Our spiral was (is?) so severe, and the media's coverage of Trae went from laudatory and even at times ecstatic to lambasting him relentlessly and blaming him for all the team's troubles. (From where I sit, he was more deserving of the credit for our early success than of the blame for our failures, but I didn't get a vote.)

If we had just leveled off rather than all but cratering (disregard the "all but" if you wish) -- if we'd finished, say, 10-8 in the conference and had won a game or two in the Big 12 tourney, I think Trae would still be in the mix. So, basically, if we'd won a game we absolutely should have won in Stillwater and had pulled off the comeback win vs. WVU (a couple of late WV fouls that didn't get whistled might have done the trick), I think he'd have been a finalist.
 
I have to say, I'm not surprised at this. Our spiral was (is?) so severe, and the media's coverage of Trae went from laudatory and even at times ecstatic to lambasting him relentlessly and blaming him for all the team's troubles. (From where I sit, he was more deserving of the credit for our early success than of the blame for our failures, but I didn't get a vote.)

If we had just leveled off rather than all but cratering (disregard the "all but" if you wish) -- if we'd finished, say, 10-8 in the conference and had won a game or two in the Big 12 tourney, I think Trae would still be in the mix. So, basically, if we'd won a game we absolutely should have won in Stillwater and had pulled off the comeback win vs. WVU (a couple of late WV fouls that didn't get whistled might have done the trick), I think he'd have been a finalist.

win the game in stillwater, and the one in ames and trae is there. those are 2 games we should have won and didnt
 
The last 10-12 games don't matter for the NCAA tournament, but apparently they do for the Naismith.
 
What a crock of ****. Trae has been beyond influential in turning a 20-loss team into a tournament team. Oh and the whole leading the nation in points and assists thing.
 
I'm not that surprised he didn't win but am shocked he's not a finalist. It really makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
Not sure any player has carried the load and impacted his team as Trae has.
First, ESPN/media couldn’t get enough of him.
Now they can’t discredit or place him on ignore fast enough.
Trae should’ve at least been a finalist.
 
Graham averages 17 and 7 and game. Brunson 19 and 5 a game. Those aren't Player of the Year numbers, but let's give it to one of them because they're on way better teams that could win without them and "look" like they are such great leaders. Give me a break!
 
Back
Top