Also, speaking of flawed analogies, your Seahawks one takes the prize. To the extent anyone doesn't think they deserved it, the premise would be that they got lucky to make it by virtue of playing in a terrible division in which no one could finish better than 7-9. By comparison, OU is a team who will finish with a bad record in one of the best conferences in the country. It's not like we are talking about a team who is 5-10 in the Missouri Valley.
As I stated in the original response, "All comparisons have flaws, but you missed the mark by a country mile on this one." I've already admitted my analogy is imperfect, but you can't even accurately critique my analogy. This 5-10 MVC talk is almost as ludicrous as your original analogy. The Seahawks went 4-2 in the NFC West, so maybe you should leave analogies alone from now on.
Also, saying this team is lucky but deserving of an NCAA Tournament bid is pretty much agreeing with those you're arguing with, so there's really no point in continuing. Nobody is saying the other equally bad bubble teams should get in above us. We've simply stated that this team is not of the same quality usually set forth for an NCAA tournament team. No team has ever gotten in at 6-12, so if that happens, it will no longer even be opinion.