OU ready to apply for Pac-12 per Orangebloods

Sooner23

New member
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
4,684
Reaction score
0
Take this FWIW. This is from Chip Brown and he was reporting this weekend that the Pac-12 had told OU "No".

http://texas.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1263940

Oklahoma will apply for membership to the Pac-12 before the end of the month, and Oklahoma State is expected to follow suit, a source close to OU’s administration told Orangebloods.com.

Even though Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said Friday the Pac-12 was not interested in expansion at this time, OU’s board of regents is fed up with the instability in the Big 12, the source said.

The OU board of regents will meet within two weeks to formalize plans to apply for membership to the Pac-12, the source said.

Messages left Sunday night with OU athletic director Joe Castiglione and Oklahoma State athletic director Mike Holder were not immediately returned.

If OU follows through with what appears to be a unanimous sentiment on the seven-member Oklahoma board of regents to leave the Big 12, realignment in college athletics could be heating back up. OU’s application would be matched by an application from Oklahoma State, the source said, even though OSU president Burns Hargis and mega-booster Boone Pickens both voiced their support for the Big 12 last Thursday.

There is differing sentiment about if the Pac-12 presidents and chancellors are ready to expand again after bringing in Colorado and Utah last year and landing $3 billion TV contracts from Fox and ESPN. Colorado president Bruce Benson told reporters last week CU would be opposed to any expansion that might bring about east and west divisions in the Pac-12.

Currently, there are north and south divisions in the Pac-12. If OU and OSU were to join, Larry Scott would have to get creative.

Scott’s orginal plan last summer was to bring in Colorado, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State and put them in an eastern division with Arizona and Arizona State. The old Pac-8 schools (USC, UCLA, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State) were to be in the west division.

Colorado made the move in June 2010, but when Texas A&M was not on board to go west, the Big 12 came back together with the help of its television partners (ABC/ESPN and Fox).

If Oklahoma and Oklahoma State were accepted into the Pac-12, there would undoubtedly be a hope by Larry Scott that Texas would join the league. But Texas sources have indicated UT is determined to hang onto the Longhorn Network, which would not be permissible in the Pac-12 in its current form.

Texas sources continue to indicate to Orangebloods.com that if the Big 12 falls apart, the Longhorns would consider “all options.”

Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe held an emergency conference call 10 days ago with league presidents excluding Oklahoma, Texas and Texas A&M and asked the other league presidents to “work on Texas” because Beebe didn’t think the Pac-12 would take Oklahoma without Texas.

Now, it appears OU is willing to take its chances with the Pac-12 with or without Texas.

There seemed to be a temporary pause in any possible shifting of the college athletics’ landscape when Baylor led a charge to tie up Texas A&M’s move to the Southeastern Conference in legal red tape. BU refused to waive its right to sue the SEC over A&M’s departure from the Big 12, and the SEC said it would not admit Texas A&M until it had been cleared of any potential lawsuits.

Baylor, Kansas and Iowa State have indicated they will not waive their right to sue the SEC.

It’s unclear if an application by OU to the Pac-12 would draw the same threats of litigation against the Pac-12 from those Big 12 schools.

Stay tuned.
 
I was expecting this with Texas pulling their CYA proposal to share Tier 1 media rights equally.

How nice of them since they will replace those $ and more with LHN while OU, who receives a higher than average share, would see a decline.

If the Big XII stays together there is only 1 option that works. That is for Missouri to get the share previously paid to A&M and for Houston to be added at the bottom of the totem pole. That works for everybody.
 
What would be really really hilarious is if the PAC invited us, osu, Mizzou, & A&M.
 
A&M does not want the Pac, gomer demands migration to their intellectual peers.
 
Just don't see the Pac-whatever taking us and OSU without UT.
 
If the Pac says no we probably ask the SEC next. Pretty sure they jump.
 
If the Pac says no we probably ask the SEC next. Pretty sure they jump.

Couldn't disagree more. IF the PAC says no, I think we try really hard to keep the Big 12 together in some form.
 
Couldn't disagree more. IF the PAC says no, I think we try really hard to keep the Big 12 together in some form.

Just a hunch but given the fact that Joe C does not make coaching decisions public knowledge and does not get publicly rejected when searching for a coach, I am pretty sure OU is not going to apply to any conference and get rejected.
 
Just a hunch but given the fact that Joe C does not make coaching decisions public knowledge and does not get publicly rejected when searching for a coach, I am pretty sure OU is not going to apply to any conference and get rejected.

Okay Mr. Attorney. "Getting told no" can come in the form of inquiring and being told they simply don't want to expand at this time. Same difference.
 
OU is right on the edge of the Pac, Big 10 and SEC territory.

You can bet if Boren and the regents decide to make a move any of those 3 will take us with or without Texas.

OU is the 3rd most desirable property out there after Notre Dame and Texas and nobody is going to tell us no and let one of the other 2 conferences grab us instead.
 
The Tulsa World's John Hoover with some interesting tweets within the last hour or so:

An Okla. regent told me today OU regents meeting changed from Mon-Tue next week to Mon. only "because they have so much going on." #Sooners

OU regents will meet in Claremore, OK on Mon. My source on Board was asked not to talk. "Negotiations are sensitive," he said.

What I expect: OU regents will vote on Big12/Pac12 move next Mon. Will be approved. OSU will follow suit. Pac-12 will announce soon after.

Again, OU regents meeting changed from Mon-Tue NEXT WEEK to Monday only. I presume that means ordering takeout, no golf.

http://twitter.com/#!/johnehoover
 
Now if we can just ditch the Texas teams altogether and take along KU / MU instead. Basketball-wise that would be much better than Tech + UT (and the Pac would have no Texas taint).
 
OU is right on the edge of the Pac, Big 10 and SEC territory.

You can bet if Boren and the regents decide to make a move any of those 3 will take us with or without Texas.

OU is the 3rd most desirable property out there after Notre Dame and Texas and nobody is going to tell us no and let one of the other 2 conferences grab us instead.

Completely agree about the Pac and SEC. What Texas decides would not ultimately have a bearing on OU getting an invite. The only situation that would prevent an invite is being tied to Ok. State.
 
What would be really really hilarious is if the PAC invited us, osu, Mizzou, & A&M.

I've read in a few places that the Pac would ideally like to invite OU, UT, MU and kansas, but because both OU and UT are likely tied to other in-state schools that's unlikely to happen (pretty sure I've also seen speculation of OU, OSU, MU and ku).

I don't know what to think right now about MU's preference. SEC, Big 10 and Pac all seem to have strong support from different groups (even some support for keeping the Big 12 together).

Wish this stuff would hurry up and get resolved. Screw Baylor for holding things up with their threat of litigation.
 
Back
Top