It amazes me how all you anonymous critics can be so flippant and hurtful with your comments......5 hr energy.....your comments make me think you must have had a kid who played at Jenks or Catoosa, and either didn't get to play much or quit....i have followed Jenks sports for some time now, and I feel that your comments are comical..Let me correct some things..........Brummett was PADEK's assistant at Jenks, and it was Brummett who did a great job in bringing in an experienced, SUCCESSFUL coach to assist him and eventually replace him at Bixby.....Padek only AVERAGED around 19 wins a year for eleven years at Jenks and lost by maybe 1? in the state finals years ago.....who in 6A basketball has done that consistently? How many state championships did Jenks win in boys basketball before Padek got there? As good as a coach as Holliday was, even THEY didn't win it all ....Under Padek, Jenks was a stalwart in the Tournament of Champions finals, AND the state tourney during his tenure, but those administrators (who, by the way, make about 5 times his salary,....isn't doc Lehman now making over $250,000 now?) caved to a few parents whose kids or kids' friends didn't get to play.......and I am in NO WAY slamming Clay Martin....he's a good person and good coach, but what has Jenks done since Padek left....got HUMILIATED in the state finals a few years ago..??...Do you people out there know how tough it is to win it all in basketball?......look at Edison a couple of years ago.....surprised everybody by getting to the finals, lost by a few.....graduated almost no one from that team, and the next year, DON'T EVEN GET to the state tourney......It's tough....North Carolina wins it all one year, DOESN'T MAKE THE NCAA last year.....did Roy Williams suddenly become stupid??No way.....Padek's a basketall junkie...i see him all the time at oru games, tu games, high school games.......he loves it, and is a good coach and seems like a good person..why make that comment that he'll screw them up?? I believe
Bixby had a losing record the year before he got there, and i saw them on tv at the end of the season, and i think they had won something like 15? that's a turnaround.....and they almost won that regional game with a bunch of underclassmen...should be fun to watch this year........
And another thing to address regarding Parker.....I read scouting reports all the time, and this amazes me....Why is it that a good white player is described as "smart, fundamental, but not athletic", but a good black player is described as "athletic, but not fundamental"......why can't they just be good players??....A black kid dunks all over some team, and he's ATHLETIC!!, but a white kid dunks all over some team and he's "FUNDAMENTAL, SMART"....Why the semantics?? Can someone explain this to me??