I have known Shake and his family, mostly his deceased father for a long time. I am probably biased.
I watched zo for the previous two years but as you said with Coach, I haven't seen him in person since he left so over a year.
A lot can change, that is why I say I have to see him play in a system. To me he was much like Clark and Collins. Guys who dominate the ball and are very much one on one guys. I have to see them fit in a college system first. Zo might be that guy and might be 1 and done or 2. I didn't see that before, but like WT said, that easily could have changed.
I just think Shake is under appreciated and that is changing some this summer. Indiana offered and KU is down to him and another guy for an offer. He is a PG in my coaching opinion. If Bill asked me where I would play him and recruit him, I would tell him point guard. That means the two are completely different.
Shake averaged 30 this year, he is averaging 11.6 over 4 assists and 5 rebs a game in the summer. He had 21 last game on 6 fg attempts. He is so efficient, so if he shot the ball close to 20 times a game, what would he average. I think he would be one of the top scorers in the EYBL.
Once again, not knocking Trier at all, as a coach, I don't see that big of a difference between the two because of their differing style, age difference and ceiling for each.
As we have said, all opinions here so no one is wrong.
