snydrosooner
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2009
- Messages
- 658
- Reaction score
- 159
As I see it we have 2 scholies available. What positions do we go after or do we just go after best available
id be happy with anyone at any position that is division one caliber
We have needs everywhere. Lets get the most talented players we can.
PG first, then best available SG or Big. If the recruits live up to expectations then I would be happy with Guererro and Jurick. I don't think we need to sign kids to have bodies like we had to this season though. If they can only sign one quality player for 2011 I say save the other for 2012.
Point guard is the position OU needs help at.
I agree. TMG had issues but he would make this team so much better. If he and Tiny had good attitudes OU would probably be a good team this year. That is about 30 points a game and makes OUs two best players good role players like they should be.
His crap off the court heavily outweighed any positivity he brought on the court. Screw TMG.
Would you mind explaining to me exactly what you mean by a really good point guard? True pg? For some unexplainable reason, recruiting a really good TRUE pg to play at OU has been a rarity.A really good point guard would help this team a lot.
:OUbball-logo:
Honestly I would just rather stand put with what we have than use a scholarship on a JUCO PG. Are we going to find a JUCO PG that is better than Blair/Newell will be next year?
Guerrero isn't the answer at PG as a true frosh...just not going to happen. Best bet from a PG standpoint is try to get an experienced player (see JUCO) and sign a bigger recruit for 2012. Other schollie give to the best available player who will have an immediate impact, not a two year project.