Anyone know why softball players can transfer and play right away and other players can't? I was watching OUr Sooner ladies play and couldn't help wodering why Pendley (transfer from Arizona last year) and Stevens (transfer from Stanford this year) did not have to sit out.
NCAA rules.
The transfer restrictions we are familiar with apply to football, as well as men's and women's basketball. In most other NCAA sports, a student-athlete can transfer and be eligible to play immediately.
Now don't ask me to explain the NCAA's logic behind these "freedoms" allowed to players in the other sports, while restricting football and basketball players. Maybe someone else can explain that.
Transfer rule: In most cases, a student-athlete who transfers from one NCAA institution to another is permitted to practice and receive athletics aid immediately at the second institution. As a general rule, the transfer student is required to serve an "academic year-in-residence" at the second institution prior to competing. However, several exceptions to the transfer rule exist that enable a student-athlete to be immediately eligible for competition at the second institution. The most commonly used exception is known as the "one-time transfer exception." As the name suggests, this exception allows a student-athlete to transfer from one NCAA institution to another on one occasion and be immediately eligible for competition. Certain conditions must be met to use this exception, including: (1) the student-athlete must have been in good academic standing and academically eligible for competition at the previous institution; (2) the previous institution must grant the student-athlete written permission to use of the exception; and (3) the student-athlete cannot have transferred previously from a four-year institution. [Note: In Division I, the one-time transfer exception is not available if the student-athlete wishes to participate in basketball, men's ice hockey or Division I/Football Bowl Subdivision football at the second institution].
I think it has something to do with scholarship restrictions. Softball and baseball for example don't have enough scholarships to field a team. Many of the players are on half scholarship so as to have enough players to field a team. With those kind of restrictions on one side of the coin means lessor restrictions on the other side.
[Note: In Division I, the one-time transfer exception is not available if the student-athlete wishes to participate in basketball, men's ice hockey or Division I/Football Bowl Subdivision football at the second institution].
As the name suggests, this exception allows a student-athlete to transfer from one NCAA institution to another on one occasion and be immediately eligible for competition. Certain conditions must be met to use this exception, including: (1) the student-athlete must have been in good academic standing and academically eligible for competition at the previous institution; (2) the previous institution must grant the student-athlete written permission to use of the exception; and (3) the student-athlete cannot have transferred previously from a four-year institution.
I think it has something to do with scholarship restrictions. Softball and baseball for example don't have enough scholarships to field a team. Many of the players are on half scholarship so as to have enough players to field a team. With those kind of restrictions on one side of the coin means lessor restrictions on the other side.
Judging by everything we know about Thomas, he has met all of the conditions that would allow him to transfer without sitting out next year.
What am I missing here?
As stated in the "note" in the rule quoted above, those rules do not apply to football, basketball or ice hockey.
Seems like Thomas' best chance to earn a waiver is that 1) Houston had a coaching change and 2) Once he declared his intentions to transfer after said coaching change, Houston put fairly severe limitations on where he could go.
I.e. no Texas schools. But admittedly I'm putting some blind hope into that idea. This guy is the missing piece next season...
True datI think the best chance is the fact that his new coach is a two time violator of ncaa rules that had a show clause
I think the best chance is the fact that his new coach is a two time violator of ncaa rules that had a show clause
I just don't see how he gets the waiver. As far as I can tell, these are generally only granted in the case of health or family issues.
I can't imagine the NCAA would allow Kelvin's previous violations to factor into granting the waiver, when Sampson has already served the time for those violations.
A player transferred away from Houston last year because his dad was a coach there and got reassigned, and he got immediate eligibility at Oregon, even though that's not where his dad got reassigned to.
So I'm not saying Thomas will get the waiver, but it's certainly possible.