Transfer Portal 2025

This is where I am at. If we beat Texas tomorrow then I’m fine with running it back next year with a healthier NIL budget. If not, that should be the end of the line imo.
I'm not fine with another year, regardless.. but i recognize the $$ bind that joe c has put the entire university in for no reason whatsoever except for incompetence (needless extensions)
 
There are smaller schools with lower NIL budgets than us that have adequate bigs. And Moser has had talent. Last year's team along had Uzan, Oweh, Moore, and Soares. Uzan and Oweh arguably regressed under their second season under Moser and then exploded the minute they left him. It is extremely hard to defend Moser's rep as a developer. And as far as seeing how he would be with a quality frontcourt. That is HIS responsibility to bring guys in that can play in the frontcourt. If he doesn't beat Texas once in a 4 year stretch, I'm not sure how anyone can defend keeping him around.
Last year’s team lacked shooting. Uzan & Oweh went to elite shooting teams and those rosters fit their game well. The previous iteration wasn’t athletic enough. Last year’s team couldn’t shoot. This year seems to be a better mix but we play against better or more mature talent on a pretty regular basis.

It’s also true that we get talent but typically it’s the young & incomplete version. Even as talented as Jeremiah Fears is, we do not get that guy as a more polished product because we can’t afford that player (maybe a bad example because he’s likely league-bound but you get the idea). 10-15 years ago most of these guys grow with the program and we’re probably doing pretty well right now. But the NIL/portal combo has not been kind to this program.

A guy like Mark Mitchell at Missouri, for example, is a junior that was a double digit scorer at Duke. Pretty good player at Duke but probably wasn’t going to be the best player on a good team. Just wasn’t polished enough yet. But Missouri got competitive in the NIL game and bought the more complete version of him. OU?

IMG_4889.jpeg
 
Last year’s team lacked shooting. Uzan & Oweh went to elite shooting teams and those rosters fit their game well. The previous iteration wasn’t athletic enough. Last year’s team couldn’t shoot. This year seems to be a better mix but we play against better or more mature talent on a pretty regular basis.

It’s also true that we get talent but typically it’s the young & incomplete version. Even as talented as Jeremiah Fears is, we do not get that guy as a more polished product because we can’t afford that player (maybe a bad example because he’s likely league-bound but you get the idea). 10-15 years ago most of these guys grow with the program and we’re probably doing pretty well right now. But the NIL/portal combo has not been kind to this program.

A guy like Mark Mitchell at Missouri, for example, is a junior that was a double digit scorer at Duke. Pretty good player at Duke but probably wasn’t going to be the best player on a good team. Just wasn’t polished enough yet. But Missouri got competitive in the NIL game and bought the more complete version of him. OU?

View attachment 2330
Your post highlights the problem. We have not had an identity under Moser at all. It's like he doesn't quite know what he wants but he overcorrects every year and we are way too reliant on one style of play. It's hard to build any consistency that way. Couple in his horrid record with roster retention and the fact that few players have progressed from year 1 to year 2 under him, I'm not sure why so many people are still willing to keep him around. I was all on board the Moser train until this year. I've seen enough to be willing to give someone else a shot.

Trying to survive on the bubble every year is not my standard for OU basketball. Is it okay if we have a year here and there where we are fighting on the bubble? Sure. Should it be every year? No. And it definitely should not be okay to miss the tourney 4 years in a row while losing all 8 games we played against Texas should that happen this weekend.
 
If the OU women can get an all-SEC center in Beers in the portal, why hasn't the men's team in the past years been at least half as successful landing an
at least an above average player at that position? Something is badly off kilter somewhere.
Is Jenny that much a better all-around program leader than Porter?
Come on…

Beers cost $50k and a car.

Number 1 players in men’s portal is $3-4-5mil. BYU got #1 player and it cost $7mil
 
Your post highlights the problem. We have not had an identity under Moser at all. It's like he doesn't quite know what he wants but he overcorrects every year and we are way too reliant on one style of play. It's hard to build any consistency that way. Couple in his horrid record with roster retention and the fact that few players have progressed from year 1 to year 2 under him, I'm not sure why so many people are still willing to keep him around. I was all on board the Moser train until this year. I've seen enough to be willing to give someone else a shot.

Trying to survive on the bubble every year is not my standard for OU basketball. Is it okay if we have a year here and there where we are fighting on the bubble? Sure. Should it be every year? No. And it definitely should not be okay to miss the tourney 4 years in a row while losing all 8 games we played against Texas should that happen this weekend.
I don’t have a problem with people wanting a coaching change. I’m skeptical of the results of a change without significant commitment to funding the program but understand the frustration. I disagree with most on the development topic. I can’t take people citing Alston Mason or Kaden Cooper as development failures seriously. It’s also true that Otega Oweh & Milos Uzan improved their games from years 1-2, but we don’t contextualize it well. Responsibility plays a factor. Both players were counted on to shoulder more of the load & weren’t quite up to the task, but they were both absolutely better basketball players than the year before (and again, the roster fit wasn’t great so those abilities shine brighter in their current situations). I also think retention is largely affected by money, especially when you’ve, to the point of many, recruited young & talented players. Roster turnover and an inability to be real selective makes it hard to create that identity you’re talking about. You have to make the pieces fit and it’s easier to do that when you can afford the pieces you want.

I do not believe everything has been done correctly. I do believe the margin of error is much thinner in Norman than at most programs we’re expecting to compete with.
 
Come on…

Beers cost $50k and a car.

Number 1 players in men’s portal is $3-4-5mil. BYU got #1 player and it cost $7mil
Well that’s interesting timing since an hour ago, the tweet came out that our women are one of two front runners for the number one recruit, who is commanding a $1.5M NIL package. So I’m sure now there will be more spin to come.
 
Well that’s interesting timing since an hour ago, the tweet came out that our women are one of two front runners for the number one recruit, who is commanding a $1.5M NIL package. So I’m sure now there will be more spin to come.
i wonder if that is 1.5 mil for 4 years ?? 375k per ?
 
Well that’s interesting timing since an hour ago, the tweet came out that our women are one of two front runners for the number one recruit, who is commanding a $1.5M NIL package. So I’m sure now there will be more spin to come.
We were talking portal. Yes Chavez will get cannady money
 
We were talking portal. Yes Chavez will get cannady money
I mean, you either have the money or you don’t. If our women’s team can pay $1.5 for a high school recruit, it makes me wonder even more about the claims that our men’s team only has a couple bags of airline pretzels to offer players.
 
I mean, you either have the money or you don’t. If our women’s team can pay $1.5 for a high school recruit, it makes me wonder even more about the claims that our men’s team only has a couple bags of airline pretzels to offer players.
if that is true it is part of the failure of Joe C ... he leaves current NIL funding almost entirely to the coaches / programs ..

so if JB has made relationships for her program to fund NIL for her players then good for her .. but that would have nothing to do with the mens team ..
 
if that is true it is part of the failure of Joe C ... he leaves current NIL funding almost entirely to the coaches / programs ..

so if JB has made relationships for her program to fund NIL for her players then good for her .. but that would have nothing to do with the mens team ..
But it sure would be an indictment of Moser. Let’s be honest, it should be much easier to generate donations for a men’s team than a women’s team, given the relative interest in the two sports. Not saying this to take a shot at the women’s game, but clearly there are a lot more people who closely follows men’s basketball than women’s.
 
I don’t have a problem with people wanting a coaching change. I’m skeptical of the results of a change without significant commitment to funding the program but understand the frustration. I disagree with most on the development topic. I can’t take people citing Alston Mason or Kaden Cooper as development failures seriously. It’s also true that Otega Oweh & Milos Uzan improved their games from years 1-2, but we don’t contextualize it well. Responsibility plays a factor. Both players were counted on to shoulder more of the load & weren’t quite up to the task, but they were both absolutely better basketball players than the year before (and again, the roster fit wasn’t great so those abilities shine brighter in their current situations). I also think retention is largely affected by money, especially when you’ve, to the point of many, recruited young & talented players. Roster turnover and an inability to be real selective makes it hard to create that identity you’re talking about. You have to make the pieces fit and it’s easier to do that when you can afford the pieces you want.

I do not believe everything has been done correctly. I do believe the margin of error is much thinner in Norman than at most programs we’re expecting to compete with.
Looking at conference play, both Uzan and Oweh's sophomore years underperformed their freshman years.

Uzan
StatFreshmanSophomore
Effective FG%52.0% (73rd percentile)44.2 % (26th percentile)
Turnover %23.7% (9th percentile)17.5% (26th percentile)
FT Attempt Rate15.5% (17th percentile)9.9% (6th percentile)
Free Throw %73.9% (46th percentile)76.5% (54th percentile)
Ast/Tov Ratio1.02x (40th percentile)2.21x (91st percentile)

Oweh
StatFreshmanSophomore
Effective FG%44.0% (25th percentile)38.2% (8th percentile)
Turnover %18.5% (28th percentile)11.2% (75th percentile)
FT Attempt Rate49.4% (93rd percentile)41.9% (83rd percentile)
Free Throw %70.7% (37th percentile)54.8% (9th percentile)
3PT %25.0% (15th percentile)20.6% (9th percentile)

In many of the areas that were important for them to develop as players, they both got statistically worse or stayed the same. Oweh significantly regressed everywhere except for his turnover %, and Uzan's turnover numbers got better leading to a better Ast/Tov ratio but he had becomes such a passive player that he was getting to the line at the 6th (!!) percentile in the country even though he had the ball in his hands most times up the floor. I'd be willing to hear an argument that Uzan stayed neutral as a player but Oweh certainly regressed.

Finding pieces that fit together, even on a budget, should be easier than Moser has made it seem. Not understanding how the players you have would fit with the players you are bringing in is a flaw in itself. There are much smaller schools with lower NIL budgets than OU putting a better product on the floor right now. That is my issue with all the NIL talk. Is there a valid reason that schools like UC San Diego, UC Irvine, North Texas, Drake, Yale, Arkansas State, or High Point should have higher/comparable net ratings when adjusted for opponents than we do?
 
But it sure would be an indictment of Moser. Let’s be honest, it should be much easier to generate donations for a men’s team than a women’s team, given the relative interest in the two sports. Not saying this to take a shot at the women’s game, but clearly there are a lot more people who closely follows men’s basketball than women’s.
absolutely he (and Joe C) has driven interest in OU mens basketball to close to an all time low ..
 
We were talking portal. Yes Chavez will get cannady money
I've seen Chavez play in person several times, since my daughter also plays AAU ball and we've been at some of the same tournies (no, my daughter's teams never played against her). She is the REAL DEAL! I'm not saying at all that she won't get that kind of $, but there's no way girl players are worth near that per season...and I have a daughter. That's close to what the top portal players were getting in men's college b-ball last season...and neither of those guys were worth the $2MM they got. Both play on teams that won't make the NCAA tourney this year and Coleman Hawkins is the 4th leading scorer on a very average K-State team. Osobor is leading Wash in scoring and rebounding and has had a nice year, but his team is 13-17! Was he really worth that kind of $ for a team that won't even make the NIT?
 
I mean, you either have the money or you don’t. If our women’s team can pay $1.5 for a high school recruit, it makes me wonder even more about the claims that our men’s team only has a couple bags of airline pretzels to offer players.
People give to softball and not baseball. Sure men have more NIL overall but if someone wants Chavez. They pay directly.
 
It's very possible OU could cobble up a package for a very good center, but none of them wants to come to OU under the present situation here.
It's an indictment of how low the program is perceived compared to our peers.
 
It's very possible OU could cobble up a package for a very good center, but none of them wants to come to OU under the present situation here.
It's an indictment of how low the program is perceived compared to our peers.
No one wants to come here because we can’t pay them. That’s the bottom line.
 
Back
Top