wow ... so much for my Iowa State theory!!

[152219]

The committee did a terrible job. There is no difference between #45 and #85.

Yes there is. #45 is likely in the tourney and #85 is definitely not unless they come from a small conference and won their tourney.

 

[152219]

The committee did a terrible job. There is no difference between #45 and #85.

And tell me, where should ISU been seeded?

 

[bocabull]

Yes there is. #45 is likely in the tourney and #85 is definitely not unless they come from a small conference and won their tourney.

I'm talking about quality wins. VCU was 14-8 vs the top 100, OU was 12-8. You want to argue they are equal? fine You want to argue OU or VCU is a little better? fine You want to say one is a 3 seed and the other is a 7 seed? Clown show.

 

[DenverSooner]

Niang had a terrible game and UAB played lights out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I didn't see it but the box score doesn't look that way. UAB shot 16.7% from 3 point range and 34.8% form the field. ISU had more steals, fewer turn overs and more blocked shots.

However, UAB had 51 rebounds and 18 offensive rebounds.

 

[coolm]

it wasn't so much lights out as the boards. UAB demolished them on the boards and more than half of it was just pure determination.

ISU has this tendency to play disinterested until they get way behind then they go into crisis mode and actually hit some of their potential. UAB didnt let them overcome with that today. Grats to them.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

Do you honestly believe OU is one of the 12 best teams in the nation?

Well, I sure thought Iowa State was one of the best 40. So much for that fantasy.