WTSooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
- Messages
- 12,055
- Reaction score
- 1,166
I definitely do know where M'Baye is going to play this year and the development of other players at the 4 and the 3 will be a big determinant of where he will play.
What I do know is that I attended a dozen or so practices last season and in scrimmages M'Baye played the 3 75%+ of the time. It seems to me that Kruger would know have spent an entire redshirt season having M'Baye develop a perimeter game unless he expected to utilize him there. There is not question Fitz, Osby and M'Baye will be on the court together a bunch.
Also M'Baye is definitely more than an inch taller than either Osby or Fitz. Of course, Fitz and Osby could be closer tom 6'71/2" and not 6'8" as listed.
It's funny how people can interpret the same "act" a bunch of different ways.
Kruger said he had M'Baye working at the 3 to improve his perimeter skills. That is easier to do if you are on the perimeter the ENTIRE practice, rather than just at times, as he would as the 4.
We also know that our "non-starters" last year consisted of Blair, Neal, M'Baye, Aren't, and Washington. See anything unusual there? Yep, Blair is the only true guard on the bench, so in order to be able to practice against a decent scout team, M'Baye on the wing was a must.
I'm in the camp that Kruger wants M'Baye to be a 4 that can spread the floor a bit, by stepping outside. No better way to prepare him for that then to put him outside during most of practice. He can play the 4, and still get the ball outside of 15 feet, and be expected to score it. M'Baye is probably going to be the best or second best rebounder on the team next year. Why in the world would we want him standing 20 feet from the rim on both ends of the court, when a shot is taken? Put that man inside.
JMO of course. And Gary, don't bother "correcting" me, I know you disagree.
Last edited: