Andrew's minutes

snydrosooner

Active member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
658
Reaction score
159
Was watching the game but also watching kids so did not get my full attention. Why did Andrew only get 19 minutes? Did he get hurt. Just seems he is out best low post scorer and we need to have him on the floor to get used to feeding him the ball.
 
Was watching the game but also watching kids so did not get my full attention. Why did Andrew only get 19 minutes? Did he get hurt. Just seems he is out best low post scorer and we need to have him on the floor to get used to feeding him the ball.

I wondered the same thing, snydro. He did play 39 the night before against Kentucky so I guess it could have been fatigue. But I didn't understand it either...Not like Neal, Thompson, or Honore were rebounding any better than he was...
 
Was watching the game but also watching kids so did not get my full attention. Why did Andrew only get 19 minutes? Did he get hurt. Just seems he is out best low post scorer and we need to have him on the floor to get used to feeding him the ball.

foul trouble played a part in it
 
I think Capel knew what direction the game was going and made the decision to rest the big fella for tomorrow. I didn't see any other reason to warrant being benched.
 
In 19 minutes he had 4 fouls, I think that says a lot. Also he wasn't hitting the boards that well, of course its not like anyone really was.
 
Back
Top