- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,345
- Reaction score
- 0
Wonder if Buzz Williams ever was contacted by Joe C. After reading this?
Big Money is Why Bob Stoops Stays at OU!
So, your point is?
:facepalm:facepalm:facepalm:facepalm:facepalm
The point is we didn't pay Stoops big money until after he delivered at OU. He was our guy and we rewarded him for making us big-time. Paying someone big time money right out of the gate, is like hiring a mercenary for a lot of money. The only bond between you is that money.
The point is we didn't pay Stoops big money until after he delivered at OU. He was our guy and we rewarded him for making us big-time. Paying someone big time money right out of the gate, is like hiring a mercenary for a lot of money. The only bond between you is that money.
Like most things in life its all about the money. Below is an image of Big 12 salaries I found in the article also posted below below.
http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/OU/article.aspx?subjectid=92&articleid=20110403_92_B1_CUTLIN171970
People complained that Joe C. wouldn't "spend" enough money on a coach because he doesn't care about the basketball program, and now we are complaining because he spent too much? Sheesh! :facepalm
People complained that Joe C. wouldn't "spend" enough money on a coach because he doesn't care about the basketball program, and now we are complaining because he spent too much? Sheesh! :facepalm
People complained that Joe C. wouldn't "spend" enough money on a coach because he doesn't care about the basketball program, and now we are complaining because he spent too much? Sheesh! :facepalm
This is a fallacious argument. "Some" people complained Joe C wouldn't spend lots of money for a coach. "Some" other people are now complaining about the amount of money spent for Kruger considering he turned us down twice. There are hundreds of people on this board, opinions vary. If I had complained about not spending but was now complaining about spending too much then you could call me a hypocrite. We are not one voice, judge what I say based on what I say not what the consensus of the board is.
This is a fallacious argument. "Some" people complained Joe C wouldn't spend lots of money for a coach. "Some" other people are now complaining about the amount of money spent for Kruger considering he turned us down twice. There are hundreds of people on this board, opinions vary. If I had complained about not spending but was now complaining about spending too much then you could call me a hypocrite. We are not one voice, judge what I say based on what I say not what the consensus of the board is.
So are you saying it is not okay that he came for the money? If I was offered double what I am making now, the job was challenging, in a community I would like, and working with people I could get along with, I can guarantee I would take the job. I would work as hard at the new job as I do at my current job. So, what is the problem?
I would do the same. If someone offered me twice what I'm making, I would work just as hard, if not harder, in the new job. Just because we made him an offer Coach Kruger, in the end, couldn't turn down doesn't mean he will approach our coaching position with any less enthusiasm and integrity than he's given to his previous coaching stops. I can't understand why he's being villified by some for doing what most normal people would do.